Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,137

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cluster evolution as a diagnostic for Ω

Open access
Eke, Vincent R., Cole, Shaun, Frenk, Carlos S.·1996·Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Abstract

The population of rich galaxy clusters evolves much more rapidly in a universe with critical density than in a universe with low density. Thus, counts of clusters at intermediate redshift offer the possibility of determining the cosmological density parameter, Ω0, with a minimum of assumptions. We quantify this evolution using the Press-Schechter formalism which we extend to flat cosmological models with a cosmological constant, Λ0 = 1 − Ω0 Using new large N-body simulations, we verify that this formalism accurately predicts the abundance of rich clusters as a function of redshift in various cosmologies. We normalize the models by comparing them with the local abundance of clusters as a function of their X-ray temperature which we rederive from data compiled by Henry & Arnaud. The resulting values of the rms density fluctuation in spheres of radius 8h−1 Mpc are σ8 = (0.52 ± 0.04)Ω−0.46+0.10Ω00 if Λ0 = 0 and σ8 = (0.52±0.04)Ω−0.52+0.13Ω00 if Λ0 = 1−Ω0. These values depend only weakly, and almost not at all if ォ0 = 1, on the shape of the power spectrum. We then examine how the distributions of mass, X-ray temperature and Sunyaev-Zel'dovich decrement evolve as a function of ォ0. We present the expected distributions at z = 0.33 and z = 0.5 and the predicted number counts of the largest clusters, both in space and in projection on the sky. We find that, even at z = 0.33, these distributions depend very strongly on ォ0 and only weakly on ゛0. For example, at this redshift, we expect 15 times as many clusters per comoving volume with if > 3.5 × 1010h−1 M⊙ and 5 times as many clusters with kT > 5 keV if Ω0 = 0.3 than if Ω0 = 1. The splitting in the integrated counts is enhanced by the larger volume element in low-Ω0 models. There is therefore a real prospect of estimating Ω0 from forthcoming surveys of intermediate-redshift clusters that will determine their masses, X-ray temperatures or Sunyaev-Zel'dovich decrements.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/mnras/282.1.263

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,137

Metadata

Authors
Eke, V. R., Cole, S., & Frenk, C. S.
Venue
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
1996-09
Volume
282
Issue
1
Pages
263-280
ISSN
  • 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2966
OpenAlex
W3022439517
Cited by
1,137
References
0
FWCI
66.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cluster evolution as a diagnostic for Ω. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/282.1.263
The paper
Eke, V. R., Cole, S., & Frenk, C. S. (1996). Cluster evolution as a diagnostic for Ω. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/282.1.263

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.