The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cluster evolution as a diagnostic for Ω
Open accessAbstract
The population of rich galaxy clusters evolves much more rapidly in a universe with critical density than in a universe with low density. Thus, counts of clusters at intermediate redshift offer the possibility of determining the cosmological density parameter, Ω0, with a minimum of assumptions. We quantify this evolution using the Press-Schechter formalism which we extend to flat cosmological models with a cosmological constant, Λ0 = 1 − Ω0 Using new large N-body simulations, we verify that this formalism accurately predicts the abundance of rich clusters as a function of redshift in various cosmologies. We normalize the models by comparing them with the local abundance of clusters as a function of their X-ray temperature which we rederive from data compiled by Henry & Arnaud. The resulting values of the rms density fluctuation in spheres of radius 8h−1 Mpc are σ8 = (0.52 ± 0.04)Ω−0.46+0.10Ω00 if Λ0 = 0 and σ8 = (0.52±0.04)Ω−0.52+0.13Ω00 if Λ0 = 1−Ω0. These values depend only weakly, and almost not at all if ォ0 = 1, on the shape of the power spectrum. We then examine how the distributions of mass, X-ray temperature and Sunyaev-Zel'dovich decrement evolve as a function of ォ0. We present the expected distributions at z = 0.33 and z = 0.5 and the predicted number counts of the largest clusters, both in space and in projection on the sky. We find that, even at z = 0.33, these distributions depend very strongly on ォ0 and only weakly on ゛0. For example, at this redshift, we expect 15 times as many clusters per comoving volume with if > 3.5 × 1010h−1 M⊙ and 5 times as many clusters with kT > 5 keV if Ω0 = 0.3 than if Ω0 = 1. The splitting in the integrated counts is enhanced by the larger volume element in low-Ω0 models. There is therefore a real prospect of estimating Ω0 from forthcoming surveys of intermediate-redshift clusters that will determine their masses, X-ray temperatures or Sunyaev-Zel'dovich decrements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cole, S., Lacey, C. G., Baugh, C. M., & Frenk, C. S. (2002) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03879.x · Cited by 1,952
Self-citationClustering of galaxies in a hierarchical universe -- I. Methods and results at z = 0
Kauffmann, G., Colberg, J. M., Diaferio, A., & White, S. D. M. (1999) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02202.x · Cited by 965
Navarro, J. F., Ludlow, A., Springel, V., Wang, J., Vogelsberger, M., White, S. D. M., Jenkins, A., Frenk, C. S., & Helmi, A. (2010) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15878.x · Cited by 860
Self-citationThe statistics of CDM halo concentrations
Neto, A. F., Gao, L., Bett, P., Cole, S., Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., White, S. D. M., Springel, V., & Jenkins, A. (2007) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12381.x · Cited by 764
Self-citationShocks and cold fronts in galaxy clusters
Markevitch, M., & Vikhlinin, A. (2007) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.01.001 · Cited by 726
Metadata
- Authors
- Eke, V. R., Cole, S., & Frenk, C. S.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 282
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 263-280
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W3022439517
- Cited by
- 1,137
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 66.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cluster evolution as a diagnostic for Ω. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/mnras/282.1.263
- The paper
- Eke, V. R., Cole, S., & Frenk, C. S. (1996). Cluster evolution as a diagnostic for Ω. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/282.1.263
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.