The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cosmological Model Predictions for Weak Lensing: Linear and Nonlinear Regimes
Open accessAbstract
Weak lensing by large-scale structure induces correlated ellipticities in the images of distant galaxies. The two-point correlation is determined by the matter power spectrum along the line of sight. We use the fully nonlinear evolution of the power spectrum to compute the predicted ellipticity correlation. We present results for different measures of the second moment for angular scales θ ≃ 1'-3° and for alternative normalizations of the power spectrum, in order to explore the best strategy for constraining the cosmological parameters. Normalizing to observed cluster abundance, the rms amplitude of ellipticity within a 15' radius is ≃0.01 z s 0.6 , almost independent of the cosmological model, with z s being the median redshift of background galaxies. Nonlinear effects in the evolution of the power spectrum significantly enhance the ellipticity for θ < 10'—for θ ≃ 1' the rms ellipticity is ≃0.05, which is nearly twice as large as the linear prediction. This enhancement means that the signal-to-noise ratio for the ellipticity is only weakly increasing with angle for 2' < θ < 2°, unlike the expectation from linear theory that the signal-to-noise ratio is strongly peaked on degree scales. The scaling with cosmological parameters also changes because of nonlinear effects. By measuring the correlations on small (nonlinear) and large (linear) angular scales, different cosmological parameters can be independently constrained to obtain a model-independent estimate of both power spectrum amplitude and matter density Ω m . Nonlinear effects also modify the probability distribution of the ellipticity. Using second-order perturbation theory, we find that over most of the range of interest there are significant deviations from a normal distribution.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The statistics of peaks of Gaussian random fields
Bardeen, J. M., Bond, J. R., Kaiser, N., & Szalay, A. S. (1986) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/164143 · Cited by 3,270
Cited by
Alam, S., Aubert, M., Avila, S., Balland, C., Bautista, J. E., Bershady, M. A., Bizyaev, D., Blanton, M. R., Bolton, A. S., Bovy, J., et al. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.083533 · Cited by 1,337
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing
Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Alarcon, A., Allam, S., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Annis, J., Avila, S., Bacon, D., et al. (2022) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.023520 · Cited by 1,124
Self-citationKiDS-450: cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing
Hildebrandt, H., Viola, M., Heymans, C., Joudaki, S., Kuijken, K., Blake, C., Erben, T., Joachimi, B., Klaes, D., Miller, L., et al. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2805 · Cited by 1,021
Heymans, C., Tröster, T., Asgari, M., Blake, C., Hildebrandt, H., Joachimi, B., Kuijken, K., Lin, C.-A., Sánchez, A. G., van den Busch, J. L., et al. (2021) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039063 · Cited by 772
Detection of weak gravitational lensing by large-scale structure
Bacon, D. J., Refregier, A. R., & Ellis, R. S. (2000) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03851.x · Cited by 594
Metadata
- Authors
- Jain, B., & Seljak, U.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1997-08
- Volume
- 484
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 560-573
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1965314269
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cosmological Model Predictions for Weak Lensing: Linear and Nonlinear Regimes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/304372
- The paper
- Jain, B., & Seljak, U. (1997). Cosmological Model Predictions for Weak Lensing: Linear and Nonlinear Regimes. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/304372
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.