Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cosmological Model Predictions for Weak Lensing: Linear and Nonlinear Regimes

Open access
Jain, Bhuvnesh, Seljak, Uroš·1997·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Weak lensing by large-scale structure induces correlated ellipticities in the images of distant galaxies. The two-point correlation is determined by the matter power spectrum along the line of sight. We use the fully nonlinear evolution of the power spectrum to compute the predicted ellipticity correlation. We present results for different measures of the second moment for angular scales θ ≃ 1'-3° and for alternative normalizations of the power spectrum, in order to explore the best strategy for constraining the cosmological parameters. Normalizing to observed cluster abundance, the rms amplitude of ellipticity within a 15' radius is ≃0.01 z s 0.6 , almost independent of the cosmological model, with z s being the median redshift of background galaxies. Nonlinear effects in the evolution of the power spectrum significantly enhance the ellipticity for θ < 10'—for θ ≃ 1' the rms ellipticity is ≃0.05, which is nearly twice as large as the linear prediction. This enhancement means that the signal-to-noise ratio for the ellipticity is only weakly increasing with angle for 2' < θ < 2°, unlike the expectation from linear theory that the signal-to-noise ratio is strongly peaked on degree scales. The scaling with cosmological parameters also changes because of nonlinear effects. By measuring the correlations on small (nonlinear) and large (linear) angular scales, different cosmological parameters can be independently constrained to obtain a model-independent estimate of both power spectrum amplitude and matter density Ω m . Nonlinear effects also modify the probability distribution of the ellipticity. Using second-order perturbation theory, we find that over most of the range of interest there are significant deviations from a normal distribution.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/304372

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
Jain, B., & Seljak, U.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1997-08
Volume
484
Issue
2
Pages
560-573
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1965314269
Cited by
317
References
1
FWCI
14.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cosmological Model Predictions for Weak Lensing: Linear and Nonlinear Regimes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/304372
The paper
Jain, B., & Seljak, U. (1997). Cosmological Model Predictions for Weak Lensing: Linear and Nonlinear Regimes. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/304372

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.