The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reionization of the Universe and the Early Production of Metals
Open accessAbstract
We simulate a plausible cosmological model in considerable physical and numerical detail through the successive phases of reheating (at 10 ≲ z ≲ 20) and reionization at z ≈ 7. We assume an efficiency of high-mass star formation appropriate to leave the universe, after it becomes transparent, with an ionizing background J 21 ≈ 0.4 (at z = 4), near (and perhaps slightly below) the observed value. Since the same stars produce the ionizing radiation and the first generation of heavy elements, a mean metallicity of ⟨ Z / Z ☉ ⟩ ~ 1/200 is produced in this early phase, but there is a large variation about this mean, with the high density regions having Z / Z ☉ ≈ 1/30 and the low density regions (or the Lyα forest with N H I ≲ 10 13.5 cm 2 ) having essentially no metals. When it occurs, reionization is very rapid (phase change-like), which will leave a signature that may be detectable by very large area meter-wavelength radio instruments. Also, the background UV radiation field will show a sharp drop of ~10 -3 from 1 to 4 ryd because of absorption edges. The simulated volume is too small to form L * galaxies, but the smaller objects that are found in the simulation obey the Faber-Jackson relation. In order to explore theoretically this domain of "the end of the dark ages" quantitatively, numerical simulations must have a mass resolution of the order of 10 4.5 M ☉ in baryons, have high spatial resolution (≲1 kpc) to resolve strong clumping, and allow for detailed and accurate treatment of both the radiation field and atomic/molecular physics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The statistics of peaks of Gaussian random fields
Bardeen, J. M., Bond, J. R., Kaiser, N., & Szalay, A. S. (1986) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/164143 · Cited by 3,270
Cited by
Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function
Chabrier, G. (2003) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/376392 · Cited by 9,071
Kogut, A., Spergel, D. N., Barnes, C., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Limon, M., Meyer, S. S., Page, L., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377219 · Cited by 938
Observational Constraints on Cosmic Reionization
Fan, X., Carilli, C. L., & Keating, B. (2006) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092514 · Cited by 788
Fan, X., Narayanan, V. K., Strauss, M. A., White, R. L., Becker, R. H., Pentericci, L., & Rix, H.-W. (2002) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/339030 · Cited by 527
Particle decays during the cosmic dark ages
Chen, X., & Kamionkowski, M. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.043502 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Authors
- Gnedin, N. Y., & Ostriker, J. P.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1997-09-10
- Volume
- 486
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 581-598
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2087860870
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 34.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reionization of the Universe and the Early Production of Metals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/304548
- The paper
- Gnedin, N. Y., & Ostriker, J. P. (1997). Reionization of the Universe and the Early Production of Metals. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/304548
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.