The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Limits on Cosmological Models from Radio‐selected Gravitational Lenses
Open accessAbstract
We are conducting a redshift survey of 177 flat-spectrum radio sources in three samples covering the 5 GHz flux ranges 50-100, 100-200, and 200-250 mJy. So far, we have measured 124 redshifts with completenesses of 80%, 68%, and 58% for the bright, intermediate, and faint flux ranges. Using the newly determined redshift distribution, we can derive cosmological limits from the statistics of the six gravitational lenses in the Jodrell Bank-VLA Astrometric Survey sample of 2500 flat-spectrum radio sources brighter than 200 mJy at 5 GHz. For flat cosmological models with a cosmological constant, the limit using only radio data is Ω 0 > 0.27 at 2 σ (0.47 < Ω 0 < 1.38 at 1 σ). The limits are statistically consistent with those for lensed quasars, and the combined radio + optical sample requires Ω 0 > 0.38 at 2 σ (0.64 < Ω 0 < 1.66 at 1 σ) for our most conservative redshift completeness model, assuming that there are no quasar lenses produced by spiral galaxies. Our best-fit model improves by approximately 1 σ if extinction in the early-type galaxies makes the lensed quasars fainter by Δ m = 0.58 ± 0.45 mag, but we still find a limit of Ω 0 > 0.26 at 2 σ in flat cosmologies. The increasing fraction of radio galaxies as compared to quasars at fainter radio fluxes (rising from ~10% at 1 Jy to ~50% at 0.1 Jy) explains why lensed optical emission is common for radio lenses and partly explains the red color of radio-selected lenses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., Knop, R. A., Nugent, P., Castro, P. G., Deustua, S., Fabbro, S., Goobar, A., Groom, D. E., et al. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307221 · Cited by 18,062
THE CASE FOR A POSITIVE COSMOLOGICAL Λ-TERM
SAHNI, V., & STAROBINSKY, A. (2000) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271800000542 · Cited by 2,767
Carroll, S. M. (2001) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2001-1 · Cited by 2,650
Cosmic Concordance and Quintessence
Wang, L., Caldwell, R. R., Ostriker, J. P., & Steinhardt, P. J. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/308331 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- Falco, E. E., Kochanek, C. S., & Munoz, J. A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1998-02-10
- Volume
- 494
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-59
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2001964122
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Limits on Cosmological Models from Radio‐selected Gravitational Lenses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/305207
- The paper
- Falco, E. E., Kochanek, C. S., & Munoz, J. A. (1998). Limits on Cosmological Models from Radio‐selected Gravitational Lenses. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/305207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.