Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 556

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evolution of Structure in Cold Dark Matter Universes

Open access
Jenkins, A., Frenk, C. S., Pearce, F. R., Thomas, P. A., Colberg, J. M., White, S. D. M., Couchman, H. M. P., Peacock, J. A., Efstathiou, G., Nelson, A. H., The Virgo Consortium·1998·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We present an analysis of the clustering evolution of dark matter in four cold dark matter (CDM) cosmologies. We use a suite of high-resolution, 17 million particle, N -body simulations that sample volumes large enough to give clustering statistics with unprecedented accuracy. We investigate a flat model with Ω 0 = 0.3, an open model also with Ω 0 = 0.3, and two models with Ω = 1, one with the standard CDM power spectrum and the other with the same power spectrum as the Ω 0 = 0.3 models. In all cases, the amplitude of primordial fluctuations is set so that the models reproduce the observed abundance of rich galaxy clusters by the present day. We compute mass two-point correlation functions and power spectra over 3 orders of magnitude in spatial scale and find that in all of our simulations they differ significantly from those of the observed galaxy distribution, in both shape and amplitude. Thus, for any of these models to provide an acceptable representation of reality, the distribution of galaxies must be biased relative to the mass in a nontrivial, scale-dependent fashion. In the Ω = 1 models, the required bias is always greater than unity, but in the Ω 0 = 0.3 models, an "antibias" is required on scales smaller than ~5 h -1 Mpc. The mass correlation functions in the simulations are well fit by recently published analytic models. The velocity fields are remarkably similar in all the models, whether they are characterized as bulk flows, single-particle, or pairwise velocity dispersions. This similarity is a direct consequence of our adopted normalization and runs contrary to the common belief that the amplitude of the observed galaxy velocity fields can be used to constrain the value of Ω 0 . The small-scale pairwise velocity dispersion of the dark matter is somewhat larger than recent determinations from galaxy redshift surveys, but the bulk flows predicted by our models are broadly in agreement with most available data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/305615

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 556

Metadata

Authors
Jenkins, A., Frenk, C. S., Pearce, F. R., Thomas, P. A., Colberg, J. M., White, S. D. M., Couchman, H. M. P., Peacock, J. A., Efstathiou, G., Nelson, A. H., & The Virgo Consortium
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1998-05-20
Volume
499
Issue
1
Pages
20-40
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1982197353
Cited by
556
References
1
FWCI
40.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution of Structure in Cold Dark Matter Universes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/305615
The paper
Jenkins, A., Frenk, C. S., Pearce, F. R., Thomas, P. A., Colberg, J. M., White, S. D. M., Couchman, H. M. P., Peacock, J. A., Efstathiou, G., Nelson, A. H., & The Virgo Consortium. (1998). Evolution of Structure in Cold Dark Matter Universes. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/305615

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.