The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient Computation of Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies in Closed Friedmann‐Robertson‐Walker Models
Open accessAbstract
We implement the efficient line-of-sight method to calculate the anisotropy and polarization of the cosmic microwave background for scalar and tensor modes in almost Friedmann-Robertson-Walker models with positive spatial curvature. We present new results for the polarization power spectra in such models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gauge-invariant cosmological perturbations
Bardeen, J. M. (1980) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.22.1882 · Cited by 2,393
Cosmological Perturbation Theory in the Synchronous and Conformal Newtonian Gauges
Ma, C.-P., & Bertschinger, E. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/176550 · Cited by 2,040
A Line-of-Sight Integration Approach to Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies
Seljak, U., & Zaldarriaga, M. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/177793 · Cited by 1,941
A line of sight integration approach to cosmic microwave background anisotropiesPreprint
Zaldarriaga, M. (1996) · Cited by 1,277
Signature of Gravity Waves in the Polarization of the Microwave Background
Seljak, U., & Zaldarriaga, M. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.2054 · Cited by 982
A Probe of Primordial Gravity Waves and Vorticity
Kamionkowski, M., Kosowsky, A. B., & Stebbins, A. J. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.2058 · Cited by 838
Anisotropies in the cosmic microwave background: an analytic approach
Wayne Hu, B., & Sugiyama, N. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/175624 · Cited by 495
Relativistic radiative transfer: moment formalisms
Thorne, K. S. (1981) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/194.2.439 · Cited by 292
Ellis, G., & van Elst, H. (1999) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4455-1_1 · Cited by 223
Complete treatment of CMB anisotropies in a FRW universe
Hu, W., Seljak, U., White, M. J., & Zaldarriaga, M. (1998) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.57.3290 · Cited by 175
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Challinor, A. D. 1999a, Gen. Relativ. Gravitation, in press (preprint astro-ph/9903283) · arXiv
- Challinor, A. D. 1999b, Classical Quantum Gravity, submitted (preprint astro-ph/9906474) · arXiv
- Challinor, A. D. 1999c, Phys. Rev. D, in press (preprint astro-ph/9911481) · arXiv
- Gebbie, T., Dunsby, P. K. S. & Ellis, G. F. R. 1999, preprint (astro-ph/9904408) · arXiv
- Gebbie, T. & Ellis, G. F. R. 1998, preprint (astro-ph/9804316) · arXiv
- Turner, M. S. 1999, preprint (astro-ph/9904051) · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,014 of 1,014
SKA weak lensing – I. Cosmological forecasts and the power of radio-optical cross-correlations
Harrison, I., Camera, S., Zuntz, J., & Brown, M. L. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2082 · Cited by 69
Empirical constraints on the formation of early-type galaxies
Moster, B. P., Naab, T., & White, S. D. M. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.09552 · Cited by 55
Cosmological constraints on slow roll inflation: An update
Forconi, M., Giarè, W., Di Valentino, E., & Melchiorri, A. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.103528 · Cited by 48
Linear and non-linear Modified Gravity forecasts with future surveys
Casas, S., Kunz, M., Martinelli, M., & Pettorino, V. (2017) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2017.09.009 · Cited by 48
Abdalla, E., Abellán, G. F., Aboubrahim, A., Agnello, A., Akarsu, Ö., Akrami, Y., Alestas, G., Aloni, D., Amendola, L., Anchordoqui, L. A., et al. (2022) · Journal of High Energy Astrophysics · doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002 · Cited by 37
Hart, L., & Chluba, J. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2777 · Cited by 36
Nakashima, M., Ichikawa, K., Nagata, R., & Yokoyama, J. (2010) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/01/030 · Cited by 34
Observing the Multiverse with Cosmic Wakes
Kleban, M., Levi, T. S., & Sigurdson, K. (2011) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1109.3473 · Cited by 28
Hoshiya, K., & Toda, Y. (2023) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.043505 · Cited by 18
Cosmological Perturbations in the 5D Holographic Big Bang Model
Altamirano, N., Gould, E., Afshordi, N., & Mann, R. B. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.00954 · Cited by 9
Optimal analysis of azimuthal features in the CMB
Osborne, S., Senatore, L., & Smith, K. (2013) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/10/001 · Cited by 8
Neukart, F. (2025) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e27020103 · Cited by 4
“Numerical solutions of these equations are obtained using a modified version of the CAMB code [19], which is a widely used tool for calculating CMB power spectra.”
Neukart, F., Marx, E., & Vinokur, V. (2025) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e27101043 · Cited by 4
A Casimir turning point as the beginning of a small flat universe
Zhang, A. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.24905
“…the same time-reflection symmetry and a single resonance. ficients a Xℓm , X ∈ { T, E } , have the covariance [59] × Y ℓm (ˆ k n ) Y ℓ ′ m ′ (ˆ k n ) (F1) in a real harmonic basis, with transfer functions of un-lensed scalar perturbations from CAMB [168] for the Planck 2018 ΛCDM parameters [169].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewis, A., Challinor, A., & Lasenby, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 538
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 473-476
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1944901286
- Cited by
- 4,920
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 226 · 2025: 298 · 2024: 272 · 2023: 263 · 2022: 265 · 2021: 291 · 2020: 327 · 2019: 278 · 2018: 281 · 2017: 259 · 2016: 325 · 2015: 252 · 2014: 270 · 2013: 250 · 2012: 234
- FWCI
- 17.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Keywords
- cosmic microwave background anisotropies, CMB polarization, line-of-sight integration, positive spatial curvature, scalar perturbations, tensor perturbations, cosmological perturbation theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
