CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 55Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

Empirical constraints on the formation of early-type galaxies

Open access
Moster, Benjamin P., Naab, Thorsten, White, Simon D. M.·2019·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1910.09552arXiv 1910.09552
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We present constraints on the formation and evolution of early-type galaxies (ETGs) with the empirical model EMERGE. The parameters of this model are adjusted so that it reproduces the evolution of stellar mass functions, specific star formation rates, and cosmic star formation rates since $z\approx10$ as well as 'quenched' galaxy fractions and correlation functions. We find that at fixed halo mass present-day ETGs are more massive than late-type galaxies, whereas at fixed stellar mass ETGs populate more massive halos in agreement with lensing results. This effect naturally results from the shape and scatter of the stellar-to-halo mass relation and the galaxy formation histories. The ETG stellar mass assembly is dominated by 'in-situ' star formation below a stellar mass of $3\times10^{11}\mathrm{M}_\odot$ and by merging and accretion of 'ex-situ' formed stars at higher mass. The mass dependence is in tension with current cosmological simulations. Lower mass ETGs show extended star formation towards low redshift in agreement with recent estimates from IFU surveys. All ETGs have main progenitors on the 'main sequence of star formation' with the 'red sequence' appearing at $z \approx 2$. Above this redshift, over 95 per cent of the ETG progenitors are star-forming. More than 90 per cent of $z \approx 2$ 'main sequence' galaxies with $m_* > 10^{10}\mathrm{M}_\odot$ evolve into present-day ETGs. Above redshift 6, more than 80 per cent of the observed stellar mass functions above $10^{9}\mathrm{M}_\odot$ can be accounted for by ETG progenitors with $m_* > 10^{10}\mathrm{M}_\odot$. This implies that current and future high redshift observations mainly probe the birth of present-day ETGs. The source code and documentation of EMERGE are available at github.com/bmoster/emerge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1910.09552

Cites

126 of 126 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The total accreted stellar mass is on the low side of, but consistent with, the predictions for Milky Way-mass galaxies by Behroozi et al. 2019 and Moster et al. 2019, who find 1-5 × 10^9 Msun.

    “(which is on the low side of, but consistent with the predictions for Milky Way-mass galaxies by Behroozi et al. 2019 and Moster et al. 2019, who find 1 5 10 9 M )”

    From Kraken reveals itself – the merger history of the Milky Way reconstructed with the E-MOSAICS simulations (2020) · cites this paper as Moster et al. 2019

    Section 3.2 (p. 7) predicts that 5% of all bound stellar mass in a halo of 10^12 solar masses formed ex situ, supporting the general point that the model predicts accreted stars at this halo mass. It does not state the claimed total of 1–5 × 10^9 solar masses for Milky Way-mass galaxies. The distinction matters because its central-galaxy estimate is lower: section 3.2 (p. 8) reports an ex-situ fraction below 1% for haloes below 10^12 solar masses. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 128 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bernardi M., Dom´ ınguez S´ anchez H., Brownstein J. R., Drory N., Sheth R. K., 2019, arXiv e-prints, p. arXiv:1904.11996 · arXiv
  2. Dolence J., Brunner R., 2008, in 9th LCI International Conference on High-Performance Clustered Computing.
  3. Naab T., Ostriker J. P., 2016, preprint, ( arXiv:1612.06891 ) · arXiv
  4. Planck Collaboration et al., 2018, arXiv e-prints,

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Moster, B. P., Naab, T., & White, S. D. M.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics (DE)
Corresponding author
Moster, Benjamin P.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2019
Volume
499
Issue
4
Pages
4748-4767
ISSN
0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1910.09552
arXiv
1910.09552
OpenAlex
W2982082610
Cited by
55
References
128
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (390783311, MO 2979/1-1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Keywords
quiescent galaxies, galaxy quenching, galaxy evolution, stellar mass function, star formation rate, stellar mass-halo mass relation, galaxy mergers, in situ star formation, galaxy progenitors, star-forming main sequence, red sequence, galaxy halo mass

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review