The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reionization and the Abundance of Galactic Satellites
Open accessAbstract
One of the main challenges facing standard hierarchical structure formation models is that the predicted abundance of Galactic subhalos with circular velocities v c ~ 10-30 km s -1 is an order of magnitude higher than the number of satellites actually observed within the Local Group. Using a simple model for the formation and evolution of dark halos, based on the extended Press-Schechter formalism and tested against N -body results, we show that the theoretical predictions can be reconciled with observations if gas accretion in low-mass halos is suppressed after the epoch of reionization. In this picture, the observed dwarf satellites correspond to the small fraction of halos that accreted substantial amounts of gas before reionization. The photoionization mechanism naturally explains why the discrepancy between predicted halos and observed satellites sets in at v c ~ 30 km s -1 , and for reasonable choices of the reionization redshift ( z re ~ 5-12) the model can reproduce both the amplitude and shape of the observed velocity function of galactic satellites. If this explanation is correct, then typical bright galaxy halos contain many low-mass dark matter subhalos. These might be detectable through their gravitational lensing effects, through their influence on stellar disks, or as dwarf satellites with very high mass-to-light ratios. This model also predicts a diffuse stellar component produced by large numbers of tidally disrupted dwarfs, perhaps sufficient to account for most of the Milky Way's stellar halo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
The origin of dwarf galaxies, cold dark matter, and biased galaxy formation
Dekel, A., & Silk, J. (1986) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/164050 · Cited by 1,919 · cited 1×
“This solution is similar in some ways to the idea that supernova feedback ejects gas from low-mass halos (Dekel & Silk 1986), but it offers a natural explanation for why some satellite galaxies at each circular velocity survive, while most are too dim to be seen.”
Result
Cited by
Guo, Q., White, S., Boylan-Kolchin, M., De Lucia, G., Kauffmann, G., Lemson, G., Li, C., Springel, V., & Weinmann, S. (2011) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18114.x · Cited by 1,205
The New Galaxy: Signatures of Its Formation
Freeman, K., & Bland-Hawthorn, J. (2002) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093840 · Cited by 1,160
Dark matter self-interactions and small scale structure
Tulin, S., & Yu, H.-B. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.11.004 · Cited by 1,111
Tracing Galaxy Formation with Stellar Halos. I. Methods
Bullock, J. S., & Johnston, K. V. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/497422 · Cited by 1,044
Self-citationDirect Detection of Cold Dark Matter Substructure
Dalal, N., & Kochanek, C. S. (2002) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/340303 · Cited by 610
Metadata
- Authors
- Bullock, J. S., Kravtsov, A. V., & Weinberg, D. H.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2000-08-20
- Volume
- 539
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 517-521
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1984125335
- Cited by
- 877
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 27.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reionization and the Abundance of Galactic Satellites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/309279
- The paper
- Bullock, J. S., Kravtsov, A. V., & Weinberg, D. H. (2000). Reionization and the Abundance of Galactic Satellites. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/309279
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.