The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Abundance of High‐Redshift Objects as a Probe of Non‐Gaussian Initial Conditions
Open accessAbstract
The observed abundance of high-redshift galaxies and clusters contains precious information about the properties of the initial perturbations. We present a method to compute analytically the number density of objects as a function of mass and redshift for a range of physically motivated non-Gaussian models. In these models the non-Gaussianity can be dialed from zero and is assumed to be small. We compute the probability density function for the smoothed dark matter density field, and we extend the Press-Schechter approach to mildly non-Gaussian density fields. The abundance of high-redshift objects can be directly related to the non-Gaussianity parameter and thus to the physical processes that generated deviations from the Gaussian behavior. Even a skewness parameter of order 0.1 implies a dramatic change in the predicted abundance of z ≳ 1 objects. Observations from the Next Generation Space Telescope ( NGST ) and X-ray satellites ( XMM ) can be used to accurately measure the amount of non-Gaussianity in the primordial density field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The statistics of peaks of Gaussian random fields
Bardeen, J. M., Bond, J. R., Kaiser, N., & Szalay, A. S. (1986) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/164143 · Cited by 3,270
Cited by
Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., Borgani, S., et al. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-6 · Cited by 899
Self-citationKravtsov, A. V., & Borgani, S. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125502 · Cited by 870
Dalal, N., Doré, O., Huterer, D., & Shirokov, A. (2008) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.123514 · Cited by 830
Desjacques, V., Jeong, D., & Schmidt, F. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 · Cited by 817
Euclid: I. Overview of the Euclid mission
Euclid Collaboration, Mellier, Y., Abdurro’uf, Acevedo Barroso, J. A., Achúcarro, A., Adamek, J., Adam, R., Addison, G. E., Aghanim, N., Aguena, M., et al. (2025) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450810 · Cited by 616
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Matarrese, S., Verde, L., & Jimenez, R.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2000-09-20
- Volume
- 541
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-24
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1983944898
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Abundance of High‐Redshift Objects as a Probe of Non‐Gaussian Initial Conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/309412
- The paper
- Matarrese, S., Verde, L., & Jimenez, R. (2000). The Abundance of High‐Redshift Objects as a Probe of Non‐Gaussian Initial Conditions. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/309412
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.