The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three New “51 Pegasi–Type” Planets
Open accessAbstract
We report Keplerian Doppler velocity variations, consistent with orbiting "51 Pegasi-type" planets, for the three stars HR 3522 (G8V), HR 5185 (F7V), and HR 458 (F8V). HR 3522 exhibits a velocity semiamplitude of 77 m s -1 and a period of 14.65 days, implying a semimajor axis of 0.11 AU and a minimum mass for the companion of M 2 sin i = 0.84 M JUP . For HR 5185, the semiamplitude is 469 m s -1 , and the period is 3.3128 days, implying an orbital radius of 0.0462 AU and a minimum mass of 3.87 M JUP . For HR 458, the semiamplitude is 74 m s -1 , and the period is 4.61 days, implying an orbital radius of 0.057 AU and a minimum mass of 0.68 M JUP . These three companions, along with 51 Peg b, may constitute a heretofore unrecognized class of planets, defined by circular orbits, Jupiter-like masses, and orbital radii less than ~0.2 AU. The relatively large orbital radius for HR 3522 (0.11 AU) precludes tidal circularization, suggesting that the circular orbits are primordial. During the past 9 years, the velocity residuals to the Keplerian fit of HR 3522 exhibit a long-term systematic trend, suggestive of an additional companion. HR 5185 exhibits velocity residuals that fluctuate erratically by ~70 m s -1 , which are as yet unaccounted for. HR 5185 has a rotation period very close to the orbital period of the planet, suggesting that the companion may have tidally locked the primary.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star
Mayor, M., & Queloz, D. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/378355a0 · Cited by 4,111
Orbital migration of the planetary companion of 51 Pegasi to its present location
Lin, D. N. C., Bodenheimer, P., & Richardson, D. C. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/380606a0 · Cited by 1,235
Cited by
Detection of Planetary Transits Across a Sun-like Star
Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Latham, D. W., & Mayor, M. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312457 · Cited by 1,415
Improved Age Estimation for Solar‐Type Dwarfs Using Activity‐Rotation Diagnostics
Mamajek, E. E., & Hillenbrand, L. A. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/591785 · Cited by 1,313
Giant Planet Formation by Gravitational Instability
Boss, A. P. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5320.1836 · Cited by 1,124
A Transiting “51 Peg–like” Planet
Henry, G. W., Marcy, G. W., Butler, R. P., & Vogt, S. S. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312458 · Cited by 964
Self-citationThe Occurrence and Architecture of Exoplanetary Systems
Winn, J. N., & Fabrycky, D. C. (2015) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122246 · Cited by 891
Metadata
- Authors
- Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W., Williams, E., Hauser, H., & Shirts, P.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1997-01-10
- Volume
- 474
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- L115-L118
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2318323104
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 33.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three New “51 Pegasi–Type” Planets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/310444
- The paper
- Butler, R. P., Marcy, G. W., Williams, E., Hauser, H., & Shirts, P. (1997). Three New “51 Pegasi–Type” Planets. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/310444
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.