Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 244

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Quadruple Gravitational Lens PG 1115+080: Time Delays and Models

Open access
Schechter, Paul L., Bailyn, Charles D., Barr, Robert, Barvainis, Richard, Becker, Christopher M., Bernstein, Gary M., Blakeslee, John P., Bus, Schelte J., Dressler, Alan, Falco, Emilio E., Fesen, Robert A., Fischer, Phillipe, Gebhardt, Karl, Harmer, Dianne, Hewitt, Jacqueline N., Hjorth, Jens, Hurt, Todd, Jaunsen, Andreas O., Mateo, Mario, Mehlert, Doerte, Richstone, Douglas O., Sparke, Linda S., Thorstensen, John R., Tonry, John L., Wegner, Gary, Willmarth, Daryl W., Worthey, Guy·1997·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Optical photometry is presented for the quadruple gravitational lens PG 1115+080. A preliminary reduction of data taken from 1995 November to 1996 June gives component C leading component B by 23.7 ± 3.4 days and components A1 and A2 by 9.4 days. A range of models has been fitted to the image positions, none of which gives an adequate fit. The best-fitting and most physically plausible of these, taking the lensing galaxy and the associated group of galaxies to be singular isothermal spheres, gives a Hubble constant of 42 km s -1 Mpc -1 for Ω = 1, with an observational uncertainty of 14%, as computed from the B - C time delay measurement. Taking the lensing galaxy to have an approximately E5 isothermal mass distribution yields H 0 = 64 km s -1 Mpc -1 , while taking the galaxy to be a point mass gives H 0 = 84 km s -1 Mpc -1 . The former gives a particularly bad fit to the position of the lensing galaxy, while the latter is inconsistent with measurements of nearby galaxy rotation curves. Constraints on these and other possible models are expected to improve with planned Hubble Space Telescope observations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/310478

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 244

Metadata

Authors
Schechter, P. L., Bailyn, C. D., Barr, R., Barvainis, R., Becker, C. M., Bernstein, G. M., Blakeslee, J. P., Bus, S. J., Dressler, A., Falco, E. E., Fesen, R. A., Fischer, P., Gebhardt, K., Harmer, D., Hewitt, J. N., Hjorth, J., Hurt, T., Jaunsen, A. O., Mateo, M., Mehlert, D., Richstone, D. O., Sparke, L. S., Thorstensen, J. R., Tonry, J. L., Wegner, G., Willmarth, D. W., & Worthey, G.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1997-02-01
Volume
475
Issue
2
Pages
L85-L88
ISSN
0004-637X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154082053
Cited by
244
References
0
FWCI
20.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Quadruple Gravitational Lens PG 1115+080: Time Delays and Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/310478
The paper
Schechter, P. L., Bailyn, C. D., Barr, R., Barvainis, R., Becker, C. M., Bernstein, G. M., Blakeslee, J. P., Bus, S. J., Dressler, A., Falco, E. E., Fesen, R. A., Fischer, P., Gebhardt, K., Harmer, D., Hewitt, J. N., Hjorth, J., Hurt, T., Jaunsen, A. O., Mateo, M., . . . Worthey, G. (1997). The Quadruple Gravitational Lens PG 1115+080: Time Delays and Models. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/310478

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.