The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Halo Properties in Cosmological Simulations of Self‐interacting Cold Dark Matter
Open accessAbstract
We present a comparison of halo properties in cosmological simulations of collisionless cold dark matter (CDM) and self-interacting dark matter (SIDM) for a range of dark matter cross sections. We find, in agreement with various authors, that CDM yields cuspy halos that are too centrally concentrated as compared to observations. Conversely, SIDM simulations using a Monte Carlo N -body technique produce halos with significantly reduced central densities and flatter cores. We introduce a concentration parameter based on enclosed mass that we expect will be straightforward to determine observationally and present predictions for SIDM and CDM. SIDM also produces more spherical halos than CDM, providing possibly the strongest observational constraint on SIDM. In our simulations with SIDM cross sections σ DM ≈ 10 -23 to 10 -25 cm 2 GeV -1 , collisions reduce the central density in galaxy halos, with larger cross sections producing lower densities. Simulations in the upper end of this range best match current observations of galaxy properties but are disfavored by cluster simulations of Yoshida and colleagues. This problem would be alleviated in models in which the cross section is velocity dependent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304888 · Cited by 9,917
Detailed Mass Map of CL 0024+1654 from Strong Lensing
Tyson, J. A., Kochanski, G. P., & Dell'Antonio, I. P. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/311314 · Cited by 335
Cited by
The cosmological simulation code gadget-2
Springel, V. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x · Cited by 6,368
Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints
Bertone, G., Hooper, D., & Silk, J. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031 · Cited by 4,979
Large-scale structure of the Universe and cosmological perturbation theory
Bernardeau, F., Colombi, S., Gaztañaga, E., & Scoccimarro, R. (2002) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(02)00135-7 · Cited by 1,922
Dark Matter Candidates from Particle Physics and Methods of Detection
Feng, J. L. (2010) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101659 · Cited by 1,448
Dark matter self-interactions and small scale structure
Tulin, S., & Yu, H.-B. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.11.004 · Cited by 1,111
Metadata
- Authors
- Dave, R., Spergel, D. N., Steinhardt, P. J., & Wandelt, B. D.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 547
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 574-589
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1982221906
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Halo Properties in Cosmological Simulations of Self‐interacting Cold Dark Matter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/318417
- The paper
- Dave, R., Spergel, D. N., Steinhardt, P. J., & Wandelt, B. D. (2001). Halo Properties in Cosmological Simulations of Self‐interacting Cold Dark Matter. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/318417
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.