The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Emerging Importance of Multidrug‐Resistant Acinetobacter Species and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia as Pathogens in Seriously Ill Patients: Geographic Patterns, Epidemiological Features, and Trends in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997–1999)
Open accessAbstract
As part of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, a total of 1078 Acinetobacter species and 842 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates were collected between January 1997 and December 1999 from 5 geographic regions (Canada, the United States, Latin America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific). The frequency of infections (by geographic region and body site), including those due to imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter species and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ)-resistant S. maltophilia, was evaluated. The possibility of seasonal variations in bloodstream infections caused by Acinetobacter species was studied, as was the activity of several therapeutic antimicrobials against all strains. Acinetobacter species and S. maltophilia were most frequently associated with pulmonary infections, independent of the region evaluated. In contrast, patterns of antimicrobial resistance markedly varied among distinct geographic regions, especially for nosocomial isolates. Although the carbapenems were the most active antimicrobials against Acinetobacter species, nearly 11.0% of the nosocomial isolates were resistant to this drug group in both regions. TMP-SMZ, ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, gatifloxacin, and trovafloxacin were the only agents with consistent therapeutic activity against S. maltophilia isolates. Rates of resistance to TMP-SMZ ranged from 2% in Canada and Latin America to 10% in Europe. The geographic differences in resistance patterns among Acinetobacter species and S. maltophilia isolates observed in this study emphasize the importance of local surveillance in determining the most adequate therapy for acinetobacter and S. maltophilia infections and the possible clonal, epidemic nature of occurrence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically
Ferraro, M. J. (2000) · Cited by 16,875
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards
Bruck, E. (1980) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.65.1.187 · Cited by 14,751
Acinetobacter spp. as nosocomial pathogens: microbiological, clinical, and epidemiological features
Bergogne-Bérézin, E., & Towner, K. J. (1996) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.9.2.148 · Cited by 1,711
(1999) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1016/s0196-6553(99)70031-3 · Cited by 901
Microbiological and Clinical Aspects of Infection Associated with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
Denton, M., & Kerr, K. G. (1998) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.11.1.57 · Cited by 852
Antimicrobial resistance in developing countries
Hart, C. A., & Kariuki, S. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7159.647 · Cited by 745
Stenotrophomonas, a New Bacterial Genus for Xanthomonas maltophilia (Hugh 1980) Swings et al. 1983
Palleroni, N. J., & Bradbury, J. F. (1993) · International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology · doi:10.1099/00207713-43-3-606 · Cited by 471
Go, E. S., Urban, C., Burns, J., Mariano, N., Mosinka-Snipas, K., Rahal, J. J., Kreiswirth, B., & Eisner, W. (1994) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90694-7 · Cited by 369
Pfaller, M. A., Jones, R. N., & Beach, M. (1999) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/598640 · Cited by 312
Self-citationPredominant pathogens found in the European prevalence of infection in intensive care study
Spencer, R. C. (1996) · European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1007/bf01695658 · Cited by 261
Cited by
Chang, Y.-T., Lin, C.-Y., Chen, Y.-H., & Hsueh, P.-R. (2015) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00893 · Cited by 419
Interaction of Oral and Toothbrush Microbiota Affects Oral Cavity Health
Shang, Q., Gao, Y., Qin, T., Wang, S., Shi, Y., & Chen, T. (2020) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2020.00017 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Gales, A. C., Jones, R. N., Forward, K. R., Liñares, J., Sader, H. S., & Verhoef, J.
- Venue
- Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-05-15
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- s2
- Pages
- S104-S113
- ISSN
- 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-6591
- OpenAlex
- W2096618073
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 11.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emerging Importance of Multidrug‐Resistant Acinetobacter Species and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia as Pathogens in Seriously Ill Patients: Geographic Patterns, Epidemiological Features, and Trends in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997–1999). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/320183
- The paper
- Gales, A. C., Jones, R. N., Forward, K. R., Liñares, J., Sader, H. S., & Verhoef, J. (2001). Emerging Importance of Multidrug‐Resistant Acinetobacter Species and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia as Pathogens in Seriously Ill Patients: Geographic Patterns, Epidemiological Features, and Trends in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997–1999). Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1086/320183
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.