Cited by 40Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchGut microbiota and healthDental Health and Care Utilization

Interaction of Oral and Toothbrush Microbiota Affects Oral Cavity Health

Open access
Shang, Qingyao, Gao, Yuan, Qin, Ting, Wang, Shuai, Shi, Yan, Chen, Tingtao·2020·Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology

Abstract

Brushing teeth is necessary for people to maintain oral health, while little work is done to explore the microbial diversity in toothbrush and study the potential impact of these bacteria on human health. In the present study, 20 participants were enrolled, and the microbial diversity in their oral cavity and toothbrush were investigated using high-throughput sequencing. Our results indicated that 1,136 and 976 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were obtained from groups CB (sample from toothbrushes using traditional Chinese medicinal toothpaste) and AB (sample from toothbrushes using antibacterial toothpaste), and pathogens Acinetobacter baumannii, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans, had also been identified from toothbrush, which increased the chance for host to get infectious diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, cardiovascular diseases, and cancers. Moreover, our in vitro results indicated that the traditional Chinese medicinal toothpaste and antibacterial toothpaste could not only inhibit the growth of pathogens, but also markedly inhibited the growth of probiotics Lactobacillus salivarius and Streptococcus salivarius. Therefore, the inhibited effect of toothpaste on probiotics, together with the existing of pathogens in toothbrush, indicating a potential risk of brushing teeth on people with sub-health state.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00017

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Toothbrushes themselves can serve as reservoirs for pathogenic bacteria that can then inoculate the oral cavity.

    “Toothbrushes themselves, however, can also serve as reservoirs for pathogenic bacteria that can then inoculate the oral cavity, bringing into view the importance of properly sanitizing and storing personal dental hygiene equipment.28, 33”
  • Both traditional Chinese medicine and antibacterial toothpastes effectively reduced numbers of a selection of pathogenic bacteria but also suppressed oral S salivarius and L salivarius, both considered beneficial.

    “While both types of toothpaste effectively reduced the numbers of a selection of pathogenic bacteria, they also suppressed oral S salivarius and L salivarius, both of which are considered beneficial.”
  • The toothpastes reduced bacterial numbers to differing degrees: ingredients in the Chinese toothpaste, such as honeysuckle, pseudo-ginseng, and mint, which replace antibacterial ingredients like sodium fluoride, permitted growth of higher numbers of bacteria.

    “The toothpastes reduced bacterial numbers to differing degrees: ingredients in the Chinese toothpaste, such as honeysuckle, pseudo‐ginseng, and mint, which replace antibacterial ingredients like sodium fluoride, permitted growth of higher numbers of bacteria.”
  • In the same study, researchers compared oral and toothbrush microbiotas of participants who used either traditional Chinese medicine toothpaste or antibacterial toothpaste.

    “In the same study as previously described,33 the researchers also compared the oral and toothbrush microbiotas of participants who used either traditional Chinese medicine toothpaste or antibacterial toothpaste.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shang, Q., Gao, Y., Qin, T., Wang, S., Shi, Y., & Chen, T.
Affiliations
Nanchang University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Shi, Yan
  • Chen, Tingtao
Venue
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Published
2020-02-04
Volume
10
Pages
17-17
ISSN
2235-2988 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3003161522
Cited by
39
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2
FWCI
5.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (20194BCJ22032, 31560264)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Dental Health and Care Utilization
Keywords
oral microbiota, toothpaste, probiotics, Lactobacillus salivarius, Streptococcus salivarius, Acinetobacter baumannii, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans, oral health, sub-health, microbial diversity
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Candida albicans, Female, Humans, Male, Mouth, Oral Health, Risk Factors, Toothbrushing, Toothpastes, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Bacterial Physiological Phenomena, Young Adult, Microbial Interactions, Bacterial Load, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review