Cited by 127Social and Intergroup PsychologyCultural Differences and ValuesMigration, Refugees, and Integration

Ethnocentrism and xenophobia: A cross-cultural study

Cashdan, Elizabeth·2001·Current Anthropology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/323821

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cashdan, E.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Cashdan, Elizabeth
Venue
Current Anthropology
Published
2001-12
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
760-765
ISSN
  • 0011-3204 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5382
OpenAlex
W1550412852
Cited by
127
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Anthropology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Keywords
ethnocentrism, xenophobia, cross-cultural comparison, intergroup attitudes, prejudice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review