Cited by 33Anthropological Studies and InsightsAnthropology: Ethics, History, CultureSocial Science and Policy Research

The Evolution of Simplicity Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. By James C. Scott. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998. 445 pp.

Yoffee, Norman·2001·Current Anthropology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/323822

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The emptying out of symbolic capital is seen across multiple domains of material culture from Naqada III into the First Dynasty, in a process termed the evolution of simplicity.

    “This is seen across multiple domains of material culture from Naqada III into the First Dynasty (Stevenson 2011) in a process that has been termed the ''evolution of simplicity'' (Wengrow 2006, pp. 151-175;Yoffee 2001).”

    From The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation (2016) · cites this paper as Yoffee 2001

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yoffee, N.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Yoffee, Norman
Venue
Current Anthropology
Published
2001-12
Volume
42
Issue
5
Pages
767-769
ISSN
  • 0011-3204 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5382
OpenAlex
W2570935146
Cited by
33
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Anthropology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Science and Policy Research
Keywords
state formation, state failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review