The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Marriage Market, Divorce Legislation, and Household Labor Supply
Abstract
This paper provides a theoretical framework for analyzing the impact of the marriage market and divorce legislation on household labor supply. In our approach, the sex ratio in the marriage market and the rules governing divorce are examples of “distribution factors.” These factors are defined as variables that affect the household members’ bargaining position but not preferences or the joint budget set. We extend the collective labor supply model developed by Chiappori to allow for distribution factors. We show that our model imposes new restrictions on the labor supply functions and eases the identification of individual preferences and the intrahousehold decision process. The model is estimated using PSID data for the year 1988. Our results do not reject the restrictions imposed by the model. Also, the sex ratio and divorce laws deemed favorable to women are found to affect labor supply behavior and the decision process in the directions predicted by the theory and to have sizable effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Becker, G. S. (1991) · doi:10.4159/9780674020665 · Cited by 10,565
Did Unilateral Divorce Laws Raise Divorce Rates? A Reconciliation and New Results
Wolfers, J. (2006) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.96.5.1802 · Cited by 950
Did Unilateral Divorce Raise Divorce Rates? Evidence from Panel Data
Friedberg, L. (1997) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2207 · Cited by 522
Cited by
Women Empowerment and Economic Development
Duflo, E. (2012) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.50.4.1051 · Cited by 2,978
Estimating Consumption Economies of Scale, Adult Equivalence Scales, and Household Bargaining Power
Browning, M., Chiappori, P.-A., & Lewbel, A. (2013) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdt019 · Cited by 429
Self-citationThe Economics and Politics of Women's Rights
Doepke, M., Tertilt, M., & Voena, A. (2012) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-061109-080201 · Cited by 203
Why Do Women Wait? Matching, Wage Inequality, and the Incentives for Fertility Delay
Caucutt, E. M., Guner, N., & Knowles, J. (2002) · Review of Economic Dynamics · doi:10.1006/redy.2002.0190 · Cited by 198
Gender of Children, Bargaining Power, and Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in China
Li, L., & Wu, X. (2011) · Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.1353/jhr.2011.0014 · Cited by 164
Metadata
- Authors
- Chiappori, P., Fortin, B., & Lacroix, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Political Economy
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-72
- ISSN
- 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-534X
- OpenAlex
- W2111833104
- Cited by
- 901
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 63.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Marriage Market, Divorce Legislation, and Household Labor Supply. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/324385
- The paper
- Chiappori, P., Fortin, B., & Lacroix, G. (2002). Marriage Market, Divorce Legislation, and Household Labor Supply. Journal of Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1086/324385
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.