The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Population Dynamics and Mutualism: Functional Responses of Benefits and Costs
Abstract
We develop an approach for studying population dynamics resulting from mutualism by employing functional responses based on density-dependent benefits and costs. These functional responses express how the population growth rate of a mutualist is modified by the density of its partner. We present several possible dependencies of gross benefits and costs, and hence net effects, to a mutualist as functions of the density of its partner. Net effects to mutualists are likely a monotonically saturating or unimodal function of the density of their partner. We show that fundamental differences in the growth, limitation, and dynamics of a population can occur when net effects to that population change linearly, unimodally, or in a saturating fashion. We use the mutualism between senita cactus and its pollinating seed-eating moth as an example to show the influence of different benefit and cost functional responses on population dynamics and stability of mutualisms. We investigated two mechanisms that may alter this mutualism's functional responses: distribution of eggs among flowers and fruit abortion. Differences in how benefits and costs vary with density can alter the stability of this mutualism. In particular, fruit abortion may allow for a stable equilibrium where none could otherwise exist.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Resource Competition and Community Structure.
Harper, J. L., & Tilman, D. (1983) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2259756 · Cited by 4,180
Resource Competition and Community Structure
Hassell, M. P., & Tilman, D. (1984) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4549 · Cited by 4,176
Graphical Representation and Stability Conditions of Predator-Prey Interactions
Rosenzweig, M. L., & MacArthur, R. H. (1963) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282272 · Cited by 2,049
Conditional outcomes in mutualistic interactions
Bronstein, J. L. (1994) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(94)90246-1 · Cited by 952
Self-citationThe evolution of mutualisms: exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation
HERRE, E., KNOWLTON, N., MUELLER, U., & REHNER, S. (1999) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01529-8 · Cited by 797
Boucher, D. H., James, S., & Keeler, K. H. (1982) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.13.110182.001531 · Cited by 672
VARIATION IN INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTIONS
Thompson, J. N. (1988) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.19.110188.000433 · Cited by 304
Behavior of Mixed Populations and the Problem of Natural Selection
Gause, G. F., & Witt, A. A. (1935) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/280628 · Cited by 279
The Benefits of Mutualism: A Conceptual Framework
CONNOR, R. C. (1995) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1995.tb01196.x · Cited by 270
Positive Feedback in Natural Systems
DeAngelis, D. L., Post, W. M., & Travis, C. C. (1986) · Biomathematics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-82625-2 · Cited by 252
Self-citation
Cited by
Interaction frequency as a surrogate for the total effect of animal mutualists on plants
Vázquez, D. P., Morris, W. F., & Jordano, P. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00810.x · Cited by 599
The Red King effect: When the slowest runner wins the coevolutionary race
Bergstrom, C. T., & Lachmann, M. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0134966100 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- Holland, J. N., DeAngelis, D. L., & Bronstein, J. L.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 231-244
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2041186365
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 8.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Population Dynamics and Mutualism: Functional Responses of Benefits and Costs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/338510
- The paper
- Holland, J. N., DeAngelis, D. L., & Bronstein, J. L. (2002). Population Dynamics and Mutualism: Functional Responses of Benefits and Costs. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/338510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.