Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 383

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Second‐Generation Objects in the Universe: Radiative Cooling and Collapse of Halos with Virial Temperatures above 104K

Open access
Oh, S. Peng, Haiman, Zoltan·2002·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

The first generation of stars is thought to have formed in low-mass halos with T vir < 10 4 K where H 2 cooling is paramount. However, the efficiency of H 2 formation and cooling in these halos may have been severely limited by feedback processes. In this paper we investigate the radiative cooling and collapse of halos with virial temperatures T vir > 10 4 K, i.e., those that can cool in the absence of H 2 via neutral atomic lines. The evolution of these halos differs from their less massive counterparts. Efficient atomic line radiation allows rapid cooling to ~8000 K; subsequently the gas can contract nearly isothermally at this temperature. In the absence of H 2 molecules, the gas would likely settle into a locally stable disk, and only disks with unusually low spin would be unstable. However, we find that the initial atomic line cooling leaves a large, out-of-equilibrium residual free electron fraction. This allows the molecular fraction to build up to a universal value of x ≈ 10 -3 , almost independently of initial density and temperature. We show that this is a nonequilibrium freeze-out value that can be understood in terms of timescale arguments. Unlike in less massive halos, H 2 formation and cooling is largely impervious to feedback from external UV fields, due to the high initial densities achieved by atomic cooling. The newly formed molecules cool the gas further to ~100 K and allow the gas to fragment on scales of a few times 100 M ☉ . We investigate the importance of various feedback effects such as H 2 photodissociation from internal UV fields and radiation pressure due to Lyα photon trapping, which are likely to regulate the efficiency of star formation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/339393

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 383

Metadata

Authors
Oh, S. P., & Haiman, Z.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2002-04-20
Volume
569
Issue
2
Pages
558-572
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2134253073
Cited by
383
References
3
FWCI
8.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Second‐Generation Objects in the Universe: Radiative Cooling and Collapse of Halos with Virial Temperatures above 104K. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/339393
The paper
Oh, S. P., & Haiman, Z. (2002). Second‐Generation Objects in the Universe: Radiative Cooling and Collapse of Halos with Virial Temperatures above 104K. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/339393

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.