Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 236Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structureGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 28 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Y-Chromosomal DNA Variation in Pakistan

Open access
Qamar, Raheel, Ayub, Qasim, Mohyuddin, Aisha, Helgason, Agnar, Mazhar, Kehkashan, Mansoor, Atika, Zerjal, Tatiana, Tyler-Smith, Chris, Mehdi, S. Qasim·2002·The American Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

Eighteen binary polymorphisms and 16 multiallelic, short-tandem-repeat (STR) loci from the nonrecombining portion of the human Y chromosome were typed in 718 male subjects belonging to 12 ethnic groups of Pakistan. These identified 11 stable haplogroups and 503 combination binary marker/STR haplotypes. Haplogroup frequencies were generally similar to those in neighboring geographical areas, and the Pakistani populations speaking a language isolate (the Burushos), a Dravidian language (the Brahui), or a Sino-Tibetan language (the Balti) resembled the Indo-European-speaking majority. Nevertheless, median-joining networks of haplotypes revealed considerable substructuring of Y variation within Pakistan, with many populations showing distinct clusters of haplotypes. These patterns can be accounted for by a common pool of Y lineages, with substantial isolation between populations and drift in the smaller ones. Few comparative genetic or historical data are available for most populations, but the results can be compared with oral traditions about origins. The Y data support the well-established origin of the Parsis in Iran, the suggested descent of the Hazaras from Genghis Khan's army, and the origin of the Negroid Makrani in Africa, but do not support traditions of Tibetan, Syrian, Greek, or Jewish origins for other populations.

Overview

CoChat Summary

Written by AI from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Y-chromosome binary and STR markers in 718 Pakistani males from 12 ethnic groups identify 11 haplogroups and 503 haplotypes, with frequencies broadly similar to neighboring regions but substantial population substructure. The Y data support Iranian origin of the Parsis, Mongolian/Genghis Khan–related descent of the Hazaras, and an African contribution to the Negroid Makrani, but not Tibetan, Syrian, Greek, or Jewish origins for other tested populations.

Key findings

  • Among 718 males, 18 binary polymorphisms and 16 Y-STRs identified 11 stable haplogroups and 503 combination binary-marker/STR haplotypes; 5 haplogroups accounted for 92% of the sample.
  • Haplogroup frequencies were generally similar to neighboring areas, and the language-isolate Burusho, Dravidian-speaking Brahui, and Sino-Tibetan-speaking Balti resembled the Indo-European-speaking majority; median-joining networks nevertheless showed population-specific clusters and substructuring.
  • Admixture estimates supported external contributions for Hazaras from Mongolia (Long’s WLS .67, mR .52, mρ .41), Kalash from Greece (.4, .32, .23), Negroid Makrani from sub-Saharan Africa (.12, .12, .13), and Parsis from Iran (1.21, 1.06, 1), but not for Baluch from Syria, Balti from Tibet, Burusho/Pathan from Greece, or Kashmiri/Pathan from Jews (estimates 0 or negative).
  • BATWING TMRCA estimates included Pakistani haplogroup 28 at ~7,000 years (95% CI 4,000–14,000), the Parsi-specific haplogroup 28 cluster at 1,800 years (600–4,500), and Hazara-specific haplogroup 1 and 10 clusters at 400 years (120–1,200) and 100 years (6–600), respectively.

Methods

  • The study analyzed 718 unrelated male subjects from 12 ethnic groups of Pakistan; DNA was extracted from Epstein-Barr virus–transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines, with informed consent obtained.
  • Samples were typed for 18 binary Y-chromosome markers (15 SNPs, an Alu insertion, a LINE1 insertion, and the 12f2 deletion) and 16 multiallelic Y-STR loci.
  • Analyses included principal-components analysis, admixture estimation by Long’s weighted least-squares, mR, and mρ, AMOVA/population pairwise F_ST, median-joining networks, and BATWING TMRCA estimation.

Limitations

  • The paper states that some population samples were small (e.g., Balti n=13, Kashmiri n=12, Hazara n=23), that origin conclusions assume modern source populations are representative of ancient populations, and that BATWING confidence intervals account for mutation-rate, growth, and subdivision uncertainty but not generation-time uncertainty.
  • Evident from the text: the Punjabi-speaking majority was not analyzed, only 12 ethnic groups were included, some haplogroups were rare or absent (with F_ST set to 1 in some pairwise comparisons), and admixture estimates could be negative or zero, indicating limited resolution.
  • The study uses only Y-chromosome data, so it captures male-specific history and cannot by itself resolve maternal or autosomal contributions; the authors note that mitochondrial DNA and other loci would help clarify histories such as those of the Negroid Makrani and Balti.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/339929

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

73 Own result · 38 Own interpretation · 10 Check pending · 7 No full text of the sources · 6 Not checked yet · 6 Own method · 5 Sources not found · 1 No basis given

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 54
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 16
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1

Create a free account to see these claims.

Create a free account to see these assumptions.

74 more claims

Create a free account to see all 146 claims and to verify the 13 references still open.

See all claims — free account

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 60 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Pandya, 1998, A polymorphic human Y-chromosomal G to A transition found in India, Ind J Hum Genet, 4, 52

Cited by

Items 101–200 of 236

Metadata

Authors
Qamar, R., Ayub, Q., Mohyuddin, A., Helgason, A., Mazhar, K., Mansoor, A., Zerjal, T., Tyler-Smith, C., & Mehdi, S. Q.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • deCODE Genetics (Iceland) (IS)
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-05
Volume
70
Issue
5
Pages
1107-1124
ISSN
0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093557681
Cited by
236
References
60
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Aga Khan Foundation
  • Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
Y-chromosome haplogroups, population structure, Brahui, Bălţi, Parsis, Hazara, paternal origin, oral tradition
MeSH terms
Alleles, Ethnicity, Gene Frequency, Haplotypes, Humans, Male, Pakistan, Phylogeny, Polymorphism, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Y Chromosome, Sample Size, Tandem Repeat Sequences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-12, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-12 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review