The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Limited Asset Market Participation and the Elasticity of Intertemporal Substitution
Abstract
The paper presents empirical evidence based on the U.S. Consumer Expenditure Survey that accounting for limited asset market participation is important for estimating the elasticity of intertemporal substitution. Differences in estimates of the EIS between asset holders and non–asset holders are large and statistically significant. This is the case whether estimating the EIS on the basis of the Euler equation for stock index returns or the Euler equation for Treasury bills, in each case distinguishing between asset holders and non–asset holders as best as possible. Estimates of the EIS are around 0.3–0.4 for stockholders and around 0.8–1 for bondholders and are larger for households with larger asset holdings within these two groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gross, D. B., & Souleles, N. S. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302753399472 · Cited by 867
Cited by
Down or Out: Assessing the Welfare Costs of Household Investment Mistakes
Calvet, L. E., Campbell, J. Y., & Sodini, P. (2007) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/524204 · Cited by 992
Research Commentary —Too Big to Fail: Large Samples and the p -Value Problem
Lin, M., Lucas, H. C., & Shmueli, G. (2013) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2013.0480 · Cited by 972
A Demand System Approach to Asset Pricing
Koijen, R. S. J., & Yogo, M. (2019) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/701683 · Cited by 688
Gomes, F., Haliassos, M., & Ramadorai, T. (2021) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20201461 · Cited by 396
Inequality, stock market participation, and the equity premium
Favilukis, J. (2013) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.10.008 · Cited by 156
Investment in financial literacy, social security, and portfolio choice
JAPPELLI, T., & PADULA, M. (2015) · Journal of Pension Economics and Finance · doi:10.1017/s1474747214000377 · Cited by 121
Does Speculation in Financial Markets Have Real Effects?
Li, T., & Loewenstein, M. (2014) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2423360 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Vissing‐Jørgensen, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Political Economy
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 825-853
- ISSN
- 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-534X
- OpenAlex
- W3122790088
- Cited by
- 1,011
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 110.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
