The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Impact of Solar‐like Variability on the Detectability of Transiting Terrestrial Planets
Open accessAbstract
Transit photometry is a promising method for discovering extrasolar planets as small as Earth from space-based photometers, and several near-term photometric missions are on the drawing board. In particular, NASA's recently selected Kepler mission is devoted primarily to detecting extrasolar planets. The success of these efforts depends in part on the ability to detect transit signatures against the inherent photometric variability of the target stars. While other noise sources such as shot noise and CCD noise are under the control of the instrument designers, this one is not. The photometric variability of solar-like stars presents a fundamental lower limit to the minimum detectable planet radius for a given star and number of observed transits. In this paper we examine the capability of such missions using bolometric data for the only star for which sufficient photometric precision exists to address this question: the Sun. The results indicate that solar-like variability does not prevent the detection of Earth-sized planets even for stars rotating significantly faster than the Sun. Four transits are detectable for m v = 12 stars with rotation periods as short as ~21 days, while six transits allow detection for stellar rotation periods as short as ~16 days. Indeed, the limits posed by solar-like variability allow for the detection of planets significantly smaller than Earth orbiting Sun-like stars. Planets as small as 0.6 Earth radii exhibiting at least six transits can be detected orbiting bright ( m v = 10) solar analogs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Detection of Planetary Transits Across a Sun-like Star
Charbonneau, D., Brown, T. M., Latham, D. W., & Mayor, M. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/312457 · Cited by 1,415
Cited by
Borucki, W. J., Koch, D. G., Basri, G., Batalha, N., Brown, T. M., Bryson, S. T., Caldwell, D., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Cochran, W. D., DeVore, E., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/736/1/19 · Cited by 1,042
Self-citationPLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BY KEPLER . III. ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST 16 MONTHS OF DATA
Batalha, N. M., Rowe, J. F., Bryson, S. T., Barclay, T., Burke, C. J., Caldwell, D. A., Christiansen, J. L., Mullally, F., Thompson, S. E., Brown, T. M., et al. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/204/2/24 · Cited by 1,042
Self-citationKepler Mission Design, Realized Photometric Performance, and Early Science
Wu, H. (2016) · Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library) · doi:10.15781/t26688n1b · Cited by 594
Kirk, B., Conroy, K., Prša, A., Abdul-Masih, M., Kochoska, A., Matijevič, G., Hambleton, K., Barclay, T., Bloemen, S., Boyajian, T., et al. (2016) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-6256/151/3/68 · Cited by 435
Thompson, S. E., Coughlin, J. L., Hoffman, K., Mullally, F., Christiansen, J. L., Burke, C. J., Bryson, S., Batalha, N., Haas, M. R., Catanzarite, J., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aab4f9 · Cited by 429
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jenkins, J. M.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2002-08-10
- Volume
- 575
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 493-505
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2152687544
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Impact of Solar‐like Variability on the Detectability of Transiting Terrestrial Planets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/341136
- The paper
- Jenkins, J. M. (2002). The Impact of Solar‐like Variability on the Detectability of Transiting Terrestrial Planets. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/341136
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.