Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 443

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dynamical Simulations of Magnetically Channeled Line‐driven Stellar Winds. I. Isothermal, Nonrotating, Radially Driven Flow

Open access
ud‐Doula, Asif, Owocki, Stanley P.·2002·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We present numerical magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations of the effect of stellar dipole magnetic fields on line-driven wind outflows from hot, luminous stars. Unlike previous fixed-field analyses, the simulations here take full account of the dynamical competition between field and flow and thus apply to a full range of magnetic field strength and within both closed and open magnetic topologies. A key result is that the overall degree to which the wind is influenced by the field depends largely on a single, dimensionless "wind magnetic confinement parameter" η * (= B R / v ∞ ), which characterizes the ratio between magnetic field energy density and kinetic energy density of the wind. For weak confinement, η * ≤ 1, the field is fully opened by the wind outflow, but nonetheless, for confinements as small as η * = 1/10 it can have a significant back-influence in enhancing the density and reducing the flow speed near the magnetic equator. For stronger confinement, η * > 1, the magnetic field remains closed over a limited range of latitude and height about the equatorial surface, but eventually is opened into a nearly radial configuration at large radii. Within closed loops, the flow is channeled toward loop tops into shock collisions that are strong enough to produce hard X-rays, with the stagnated material then pulled by gravity back onto the star in quite complex and variable inflow patterns. Within open field flow, the equatorial channeling leads to oblique shocks that are again strong enough to produce X-rays and also lead to a thin, dense, slowly outflowing "disk" at the magnetic equator. The polar flow is characterized by a faster-than-radial expansion that is more gradual than anticipated in previous one-dimensional flow tube analyses and leads to a much more modest increase in terminal speed (less than 30%), consistent with observational constraints. Overall, the results here provide a dynamical groundwork for interpreting many types of observations—e.g., UV line profile variability, redshifted absorption or emission features, enhanced density-squared emission, and X-ray emission—that might be associated with perturbation of hot-star winds by surface magnetic fields.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/341543

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 443

Metadata

Authors
ud‐Doula, A., & Owocki, S. P.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2002-09
Volume
576
Issue
1
Pages
413-428
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2057503149
Cited by
443
References
14
FWCI
8.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamical Simulations of Magnetically Channeled Line‐driven Stellar Winds. I. Isothermal, Nonrotating, Radially Driven Flow. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/341543
The paper
ud‐Doula, A., & Owocki, S. P. (2002). Dynamical Simulations of Magnetically Channeled Line‐driven Stellar Winds. I. Isothermal, Nonrotating, Radially Driven Flow. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/341543

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.