The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nucleosynthesis in Massive Stars with Improved Nuclear and Stellar Physics
Open accessAbstract
We present the first calculations to follow the evolution of all stable nuclei and their radioactive progenitors in stellar models computed from the onset of central hydrogen burning through explosion as Type II supernovae. Calculations are performed for Population I stars of 15, 19, 20, 21, and 25 M ☉ using the most recently available experimental and theoretical nuclear data, revised opacity tables, neutrino losses, and weak interaction rates and taking into account mass loss due to stellar winds. A novel "adaptive" reaction network is employed with a variable number of nuclei (adjusted each time step) ranging from ~700 on the main sequence to ≳2200 during the explosion. The network includes, at any given time, all relevant isotopes from hydrogen through polonium ( Z = 84). Even the limited grid of stellar masses studied suggests that overall good agreement can be achieved with the solar abundances of nuclei between 16 O and 90 Zr. Interesting discrepancies are seen in the 20 M ☉ model and (so far, only in that model) are a consequence of the merging of the oxygen, neon, and carbon shells about a day prior to core collapse. We find that, in some stars, most of the " p -process" nuclei can be produced in the convective oxygen-burning shell moments prior to collapse; in others, they are made only in the explosion. Serious deficiencies still exist in all cases for the p -process isotopes of Ru and Mo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Evolution and Explosion of Massive Stars. II. Explosive Hydrodynamics and Nucleosynthesis
Woosley, S. E., & Weaver, T. A. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/192237 · Cited by 3,761
Self-citation
Cited by
MESA ISOCHRONES AND STELLAR TRACKS (MIST). I. SOLAR-SCALED MODELS
Choi, J., Dotter, A., Conroy, C., Cantiello, M., Paxton, B., & Johnson, B. D. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/823/2/102 · Cited by 2,922
Nucleosynthesis yields of core-collapse supernovae and hypernovae, and galactic chemical evolution
Nomoto, K., Tominaga, N., Umeda, H., Kobayashi, C., & Maeda, K. (2006) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.05.008 · Cited by 734
Galactic Evolution of Sr, Y, and Zr: A Multiplicity of Nucleosynthetic Processes
Travaglio, C., Gallino, R., Arnone, E., Cowan, J., Jordan, F., & Sneden, C. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/380507 · Cited by 635
The Birth Environment of the Solar System
Adams, F. C. (2010) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130830 · Cited by 464
THE REMARKABLE DEATHS OF 9–11 SOLAR MASS STARS
Woosley, S. E., & Heger, A. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/810/1/34 · Cited by 306
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rauscher, T., Heger, A., Hoffman, R. D., & Woosley, S. E.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 576
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 323-348
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2167689711
- Cited by
- 933
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nucleosynthesis in Massive Stars with Improved Nuclear and Stellar Physics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/341728
- The paper
- Rauscher, T., Heger, A., Hoffman, R. D., & Woosley, S. E. (2002). Nucleosynthesis in Massive Stars with Improved Nuclear and Stellar Physics. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/341728
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.