The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Product Experience Is Seductive
Abstract
Product experience seduces consumers into believing that they learn more than is actually so. There are several reasons for this. First, experience is more engaging than most attempts at education, both more vivid and intentional, and consequently more memorable. Second, experience is viewed as nonpartisan, devoid of the didacticism of formal education and the self-serving interests of advertisers. Third, much of experience is ambiguous, but not recognized as such. Experiencesupports a pseudodiagnosticity that draws the consumer in as a willing partner in the se-duction. Finally, the endogeneity of tastes allows consumers to accommodate to chosen alternatives and results in infrequent regrets about being seduced. Experience without learning is better than learning without experience. (Anonymous) That all our knowledge begins with experience, there is indeed no doubt... but although our knowledge originates with experience, it does not all arise out of experience. (Immanuel
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
“Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms.”
Ellsberg, D. (1961) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1884324 · Cited by 7,891
The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts
Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209380 · Cited by 3,811
Accounting for the effects of accountability.
Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255 · Cited by 2,383
Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing
Klayman, J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.211 · Cited by 2,094
Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987.
Bornstein, R. F. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265 · Cited by 1,970 · cited 1×
“There is some evidence suggesting that mere exposure effects and other forms of implicit learning are greater when the subject is unaware of being exposed (Bornstein 1989).”
BackgroundFestinger, L. (1962) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1062-93 · Cited by 1,421
On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort.
Elliot, A. J., & Devine, P. G. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.382 · Cited by 1,289
Consumer Skepticism of Advertising Claims: Testing Hypotheses from Economics of Information
Ford, G. T., Smith, D. B., & Swasy, J. L. (1990) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209228 · Cited by 481
Cited by
How Package Design and Packaged‐based Marketing Claims Lead to Overeating
Chandon, P. (2013) · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · doi:10.1093/aepp/pps028 · Cited by 249
Foubert, B., & Gijsbrechts, E. (2016) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2015.0973 · Cited by 72
Who is kidding whom? A study of complicity, seduction and deception in the marketplace
Chadderton, C., & Croft, R. (2006) · Social Responsibility Journal · doi:10.1108/eb059274 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoch, S. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 448-454
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W2023006574
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 11.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Product Experience Is Seductive. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/344422
- The paper
- Hoch, S. J. (2002). Product Experience Is Seductive. Journal of Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/344422
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.