The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Observed and Physical Properties of Core‐Collapse Supernovae
Open accessAbstract
I use photometry and spectroscopy data for 24 Type II plateau supernovae (SNe IIP) to examine their observed and physical properties. This data set shows that these objects encompass a wide range of ~5 mag in their plateau luminosities, their expansion velocities vary by a factor of 5, and the nickel masses produced in these explosions go from 0.0016 to 0.26 M ☉ . From a subset of 16 objects I find that the explosion energies vary between 0.6 × 10 51 and 5.5 × 10 51 ergs, the ejected masses encompass the range 14-56 M ☉ , and the progenitors' radii go from 80 to 600 R ☉ . Despite this great diversity, several regularities emerge, which reveal that there is a continuum in the properties of these objects from the faint, low-energy, nickel-poor SNe 1997D and 1999br, to the bright, high-energy, nickel-rich SN 1992am. This study provides evidence that more massive progenitors produce more energetic explosions, thus suggesting that the outcome of the core collapse is somewhat determined by the envelope mass. I also find that SNe with greater energies produce more nickel. Similar relationships appear to hold for SNe Ib/c, which suggests that both SNe II and SNe Ib/c share the same core physics. When the whole sample of core-collapse objects is considered, there is a continuous distribution of energies below 8 × 10 51 ergs. Far above in energy scale and nickel production lies the extreme hypernova 1998bw, the only SN firmly associated with a gamma-ray burst.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305772 · Cited by 15,126
Arnett, D. (1996) · doi:10.1515/9780691221663 · Cited by 619
Cited by
CORE-COLLAPSE SUPERNOVAE FROM 9 TO 120 SOLAR MASSES BASED ON NEUTRINO-POWERED EXPLOSIONS
Sukhbold, T., Ertl, T., Woosley, S. E., Brown, J. M., & Janka, H.-T. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/821/1/38 · Cited by 1,117
Nucleosynthesis yields of core-collapse supernovae and hypernovae, and galactic chemical evolution
Nomoto, K., Tominaga, N., Umeda, H., Kobayashi, C., & Maeda, K. (2006) · Nuclear Physics A · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.05.008 · Cited by 734
Explosions of O-Ne-Mg cores, the Crab supernova, and subluminous type II-P supernovae
Kitaura, F. S., Janka, H.-T., & Hillebrandt, W. (2006) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054703 · Cited by 578
Di Valentino, E., Said, J. L., Riess, A., Pollo, A., Poulin, V., Gómez-Valent, A., Weltman, A., Palmese, A., Huang, C. D., Bruck, C. V. D., et al. (2025) · Physics of the Dark Universe · doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101965 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamuy, M.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2003-01-10
- Volume
- 582
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 905-914
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2053876856
- Cited by
- 470
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Observed and Physical Properties of Core‐Collapse Supernovae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/344689
- The paper
- Hamuy, M. (2003). Observed and Physical Properties of Core‐Collapse Supernovae. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/344689
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.