Working during School and Academic Performance
Abstract
Unique new data from a college with a mandatory work‐study program are used to examine the relationship between working during school and academic performance. Particular attention is paid to the importance of biases that are potentially present because the number of hours that are worked is endogenously chosen by the individual. The results suggest that, even if results appear reasonable, a researcher should be cautious when drawing policy conclusions about the relationship between hours worked and a particular outcome of interest unless he or she is confident that potential problems associated with the endogeneity of hours have been adequately addressed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Three relevant studies have used quasi-experimental methods and a fourth study carefully matched participants with observably similar non-participants to provide suggestive evidence on the program's consequences.
“But three relevant studies have used quasi-experimental methods (Stinebrickner & Stinebrickner, 2003;Scott-Clayton, 2011;Soliz & Long, 2016) and a fourth study carefully matched participants with observably similar non-participants (Scott-Clayton & Minaya, 2016) to provide suggestive evidence on the program's consequences.”
From College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions (2022) · cites this paper as Stinebrickner & Stinebrickner, 2003
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The wired generation: Academic and social outcomes of electronic media use among university students
Jacobsen, W. C., & Forste, R. (2011) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0135 · Cited by 710 · see citing works
Student Loans: Do College Students Borrow Too Much—Or Not Enough?
Avery, C., & Turner, S. (2012) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.26.1.165 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
Darolia, R. (2014) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.10.004 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Is College a Worthwhile Investment?
Barrow, L., & Malamud, O. (2015) · Annual Review of Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115510 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Broton, K. M., Goldrick-Rab, S., & Benson, J. (2016) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/0162373716638440 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions
Dynarski, S., Page, L., & Scott-Clayton, J. (2022) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w30275 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
- Authors
- Stinebrickner, R., & Stinebrickner, T. R.
- Affiliations
- Berea College (US)
- Western University (CA)
- Venue
- Journal of Labor Economics
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 473-491
- ISSN
- 0734-306X (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5307
- OpenAlex
- W2055367424
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 38.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Labor Economics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Keywords
- student employment, work-study programs, academic performance, selection bias, university students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review