Cited by 238Higher Education Research StudiesEducational Outcomes and InfluencesSchool Choice and Performance

Working (and studying) day and night: Heterogeneous effects of working on the academic performance of full-time and part-time students

Darolia, Rajeev·2014·Economics of Education Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.10.004

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Barnow, 1980, Issues in the analysis of selectivity bias, Vol. 5
  2. Hood, 1992, The impact of athletics, part-time employment and other activities on academic achievement, Journal of College Student Development, 33, 447

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Darolia, R.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Darolia, Rajeev
Venue
Economics of Education Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
38
Pages
38-50
ISSN
0272-7757 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045765940
Cited by
238
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5
FWCI
43.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Economics of Education Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
student employment, academic performance, GRADE, full-time students, part-time students, endogeneity, undergraduate students, working hours

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review