Cited by 620Corruption and Economic DevelopmentTaxation and Compliance StudiesLaw, Economics, and Judicial Systems

The Role of Wages and Auditing during a Crackdown on Corruption in the City of Buenos Aires

Open access
Di Tella, Rafael, Schargrodsky, Ernesto·2003·The Journal of Law and Economics

Abstract

We study the prices paid for basic inputs during a crackdown on corruption in the public hospitals of the city of Buenos Aires, Argentina during 1996-97. We find a well-defined, negative effect on the measures used to capture corruption. Prices paid by hospitals for basic, homogeneous inputs fall by 15% during the first nine months of the crackdown. After this period prices rise, but they are still 10% lower than those prevailing before the crackdown. Relative to the pre-crackdown period, higher wages play no role in inducing lower input prices when audit intensity can be expected to be maximal (during the first phase of the crackdown), but have a negative and well-defined effect when audit intensity takes intermediate levels (the last phase of the crackdown). Controlling for fixed effects, we find that the wage elasticity of input prices exceeds 20%. These results are consistent with the standard model of bribes of Becker and Stigler (1974).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/345578

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Di Tella and Schargrodosky (2003) demonstrated that the effect of economic incentives for public officials on corruption is negative and significant only when associated to audits systems.

    “For example, the study of Di Tella and Schargrodosky (2003) demonstrated that the effect of economic incentives for public officials on corruption is negative and significant only when associated to audits systems (Di Tella and Schargrodosky 2003).”

    From Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as Di Tella and Schargrodosky 2003

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Di Tella, R., & Schargrodsky, E.
Affiliations
Universidad Torcuato Di Tella (AR)
Venue
The Journal of Law and Economics
Published
2003-04
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
269-292
ISSN
  • 0022-2186 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5285
OpenAlex
W3123080973
Cited by
620
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 35
FWCI
83.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Law and Economics (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • Repositorio Digital Universidad Torcuato Di Tella (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • bepress Legal Repository (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Taxation and Compliance Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Keywords
public hospitals, input prices, wages, auditing, bribery, Buenos Aires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review