Cited by 146Corruption and Economic DevelopmentExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesTaxation and Compliance Studies

A controlled field experiment on corruption

Armantier, Olivier, Boly, Amadou·2011·European Economic Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2011.04.007

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Armantier & Boly (2011) concluded that preliminary results provide some support to the external validity of lab experiments on corruption.

    “In a subsequent study on the external validity of laboratory experiments on corruption, the same authors (Armantier & Boly, 2011), concluded that “Although a definitive answer to the external validity question has yet to be provided, these preliminary results provide some support to the external validity of lab experiments on corruption.””

    From Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as Armantier & Boly, 2011

  • There is no significant difference between laboratory and field experiments in the effect of anti-corruption policies.

    “Results show no difference between laboratory and field experiments (a result already known in the literature, see for example Armantier & Boly, 2011; Camerer 2012; Whang 2009), as the coefficient associated with the dummy variable is never statistically different from zero.”

    From Public sector reforms and their impact on the level of corruption: A systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as Armantier & Boly, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Armantier, O., & Boly, A.
Affiliations
  • Federal Reserve Bank of New York (US)
  • United Nations Industrial Development Organization (AT)
Corresponding author
Armantier, Olivier
Venue
European Economic Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
55
Issue
8
Pages
1072-1082
ISSN
0014-2921 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007950074
Cited by
146
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
22.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Taxation and Compliance Studies
Keywords
corruption, bribery, wage effects, reciprocity, intrinsic motivation, deterrence, religiosity, causes of corruption, field experiments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review