Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 573Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structureEurasian Exchange Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 16 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

The Genetic Legacy of the Mongols

Open access

Abstract

We have identified a Y-chromosomal lineage with several unusual features. It was found in 16 populations throughout a large region of Asia, stretching from the Pacific to the Caspian Sea, and was present at high frequency: approximately 8% of the men in this region carry it, and it thus makes up approximately 0.5% of the world total. The pattern of variation within the lineage suggested that it originated in Mongolia approximately 1,000 years ago. Such a rapid spread cannot have occurred by chance; it must have been a result of selection. The lineage is carried by likely male-line descendants of Genghis Khan, and we therefore propose that it has spread by a novel form of social selection resulting from their behavior.

Overview

CoChat Summary

Written by AI from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper identifies a Y-chromosomal lineage, the “star cluster,” that spread rapidly across Asia within the last ~1,000 years and is now carried by ~8% of men in the region. The authors argue this spread cannot be explained by chance and propose it resulted from social selection linked to Genghis Khan and his male relatives.

Key findings

  • A closely related Y-chromosomal lineage in haplogroup C*(xC3c), called the “star cluster,” was found in 16 populations from Central Asia to the Pacific; it represents ~8% of males in the region and, if the sample is representative, ~16 million men, or ~0.5% of the world’s total.
  • TMRCA estimates were ~1,000 years (95% CI ~700–1,300 years) with BAT-WING and ~860 years (~590–1,300 years) with the r method; the most likely place of origin was Mongolia.
  • Neutrality was rejected: under double exponential growth, the probability of the observed low variation at ~8% frequency was <10^-237, and even with a 10-fold lower mutation rate it was still <10^-10.
  • The authors propose the lineage spread through Genghis Khan and his male relatives via a novel form of social selection; Hazara oral genealogies and Y profiles support a link, and in simplest models the founder male would contribute ~4% of autosomal and ~2.7% of X-chromosomal ancestry in the affected population.

Methods

  • Y-chromosomal haplotypes were generated for 2,123 men, including 1,126 individuals described elsewhere, using binary markers and 16 Y microsatellites; DYS19 was excluded from network analysis because it is duplicated in haplogroup C.
  • The star cluster was defined as haplotypes linked without gaps to the central haplotype in a median-joining network of haplogroup C*(xC3c).
  • TMRCA was estimated with BAT-WING and an r method assuming a 30-year generation time; neutrality was tested using a method that compares observed lineage frequency with its level of variation under demographic models.

Limitations

  • The paper states that Genghis Khan’s remains cannot be examined directly, so the link to him relies on historical inference and Hazara oral genealogy/Y-profile comparison.
  • The paper states that biological selection cannot be entirely ruled out and that whether the case represents group selection is unclear.
  • The paper’s 16-million/0.5% estimate is explicitly conditional on the sample being representative; TMRCA estimates depend on demographic models and the assumed 30-year generation time, and the star-cluster definition uses a network-based inclusion criterion (the latter two are evident from the methods).

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/367774

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

21 Own interpretation · 10 Own result · 9 Sources not found · 4 Check pending · 3 No full text of the sources

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 15
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 4

Create a free account to see these claims.

Create a free account to see these assumptions.

23 more claims

Create a free account to see all 47 claims and to verify the 4 references still open.

See all claims — free account

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

24 more claims about this paper

Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.

See all claims — free account

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Edleston, 1865, Amphydasis betularia, Entomologist, 2, 150

Cited by

Items 201–300 of 573

Metadata

Authors
Zerjal, T., Xue, Y., Bertorelle, G., Wells, R. S., Bao, W., Zhu, S., Qamar, R., Ayub, Q., Mohyuddin, A., Fu, S., Li, P., Yuldasheva, N., Ruzibakiev, R., Xu, J., Shu, Q., Du, R., Yang, H., Hurles, M. E., Robinson, E., Gerelsaikhan, T., Dashnyam, B., Mehdi, S. Q., & Tyler-Smith, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Harbin Medical University (CN)
  • University of Ferrara (IT)
  • Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Academy of Sciences Republic of Uzbekistan (UZ)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Mongolian Academy of Sciences (MN)
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-03
Volume
72
Issue
3
Pages
717-721
ISSN
0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142431182
Cited by
563
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 26
FWCI
6.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Royal Society
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Eurasian Exchange Networks
Keywords
Y-chromosome lineages, Genghis Khan, social selection, Mongol expansion, population genetics, genetic ancestry, East Asia
MeSH terms
Chromosome Mapping, Geography, Haplotypes, Humans, Male, Models, Genetic, Mongolia, Mutation, Russia, Selection, Genetic, Time, Chromosomes, Human, Y, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-12, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-12 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review