Historical and Lexical Notes on the New Series of Hammamat Inscriptions
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Contemporary reports indicate that expeditionary activity was seasonal, so these data may be useful for Sothic dating of the Old Kingdom.
“Contemporary reports (see: [Breasted 1906, 321-322, §733-736;Simpson 1959, 23]) indicate that this expeditionary activi-ty was seasonal, so these data may be useful for Sothic dating of the OK.”
From Sothic Dating of the Egyptian Old Kingdom (2024) · cites this paper as Simpson 1959
Cited by
Sorted by citations
THE OLD KINGDOM IN EGYPT AND THE BEGINNING OF THE FIRST INTERMEDIATE PERIOD
Smith, W. S. (1971) · The Cambridge Ancient History · doi:10.1017/chol9780521077910.005 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Sothic Dating of the Egyptian Old Kingdom
Puchkov, A. (2024) · The World of the Orient · doi:10.15407/orientw2024.01.042
- Authors
- Simpson, W. K.
- Corresponding author
- Simpson, William Kelly
- Venue
- Journal of Near Eastern Studies
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1959-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20-37
- ISSN
- 0022-2968 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-6978
- OpenAlex
- W2074529953
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Near Eastern Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeology and Historical Studies
- Keywords
- Akkadian inscriptions, lexical notes, historical notes, Neo-Babylonian period, Ur III period, Mesopotamian epigraphy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
