CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 717Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The First Measurement of Spectral Lines in a Short-Period Star Bound to the Galaxy’s Central Black Hole: A Paradox of Youth

Open access
Ghez, A. M., Duchêne, G., Matthews, K., Hornstein, S. D., Tanner, A., Larkin, J., Morris, M., Becklin, E. E., Salim, S., Kremenek, T., Thompson, D., Soifer, B. T., Neugebauer, G., McLean, I.·2003·The Astrophysical Journal
DOI 10.1086/374804
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We have obtained the first detection of spectral absorption lines in one of the high-velocity stars in the vicinity of the Galaxy's central supermassive black hole. Both Brγ (2.1661 μm) and He I (2.1126 μm) are seen in absorption in S0-2 with equivalent widths (2.8 ± 0.3 and 1.7 ± 0.4 Å) and an inferred stellar rotational velocity (220 ± 40 km s -1 ) that are consistent with that of an O8-B0 dwarf, which suggests that it is a massive (~15 M ☉ ) young (less than 10 Myr) main-sequence star. This presents a major challenge to star formation theories, given the strong tidal forces that prevail over all distances reached by S0-2 in its current orbit (130-1900 AU) and the difficulty in migrating this star inward during its lifetime from farther out where tidal forces should no longer preclude star formation. The radial velocity measurements ( = -510 ± 40 km s -1 ) and our reported proper motions for S0-2 strongly constrain its orbit, providing a direct measure of the black hole mass of 4.1(±0.6) × 10 6 3 M ☉ . The Keplerian orbit parameters have uncertainties that are reduced by a factor of 2-3 compared to previously reported values and include, for the first time, an independent solution for the dynamical center; this location, while consistent with the nominal infrared position of Sgr A*, is localized to a factor of 5 more precisely (±2 mas). Furthermore, the ambiguity in the inclination of the orbit is resolved with the addition of the radial velocity measurement, indicating that the star is behind the black hole at the time of closest approach and counterrevolving against the Galaxy. With further radial velocity measurements in the next few years, the orbit of S0-2 will provide the most robust estimate of the distance to the Galactic center.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/374804

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ghez, A. M., Becklin, E. E., Duchene, G., Hornstein, S., Morris, M., Salim, S. & Tanner, A. 2003, Astron. Nachr., in press
  2. 10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.002021 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 717

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ghez, A. M., Duchêne, G., Matthews, K., Hornstein, S. D., Tanner, A., Larkin, J., Morris, M., Becklin, E. E., Salim, S., Kremenek, T., Thompson, D., Soifer, B. T., Neugebauer, G., & McLean, I.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
ORCID
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Publisher
American Astronomical Society
Published
2003-04-01
Volume
586
Issue
2
Pages
L127-L131
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
DOI
10.1086/374804
OpenAlex
W2003155983
Cited by
717
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 21
FWCI
40.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9988397, 9876783)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • W. M. Keck Foundation
  • California Institute of Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
Galactic Center, supermassive black holes, Sgr A*, black hole mass, stellar orbits, tidal disruption, young massive stars, stellar rotation, radial velocity, proper motions, Keplerian orbits, galactocentric distance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review