Cited by 1,779Astrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

MONITORING STELLAR ORBITS AROUND THE MASSIVE BLACK HOLE IN THE GALACTIC CENTER

Open access
Gillessen, S., Eisenhauer, F., Trippe, S., Alexander, T., Genzel, R., Martins, F., Ott, T.·2009·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We present the results of 16 years of monitoring stellar orbits around the massive black hole in the center of the Milky Way, using high-resolution near-infrared techniques. This work refines our previous analysis mainly by greatly improving the definition of the coordinate system, which reaches a long-term astrometric accuracy of ≈300 μas, and by investigating in detail the individual systematic error contributions. The combination of a long-time baseline and the excellent astrometric accuracy of adaptive optics data allows us to determine orbits of 28 stars, including the star S2, which has completed a full revolution since our monitoring began. Our main results are: all stellar orbits are fit extremely well by a single-point-mass potential to within the astrometric uncertainties, which are now ≈6 × better than in previous studies. The central object mass is , where the fractional statistical error of 1.5% is nearly independent from R 0 , and the main uncertainty is due to the uncertainty in R 0 . Our current best estimate for the distance to the Galactic center is R 0 = 8.33 ± 0.35 kpc. The dominant errors in this value are systematic. The mass scales with distance as (3.95 ± 0.06) × 10 6 ( R 0 /8 kpc) 2.19 M ☉ . The orientations of orbital angular momenta for stars in the central arcsecond are random. We identify six of the stars with orbital solutions as late-type stars, and six early-type stars as members of the clockwise-rotating disk system, as was previously proposed. We constrain the extended dark mass enclosed between the pericenter and apocenter of S2 at less than 0.066, at the 99% confidence level, of the mass of Sgr A*. This is two orders of magnitudes larger than what one would expect from other theoretical and observational estimates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0004-637x/692/2/1075

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Alexander, T. 2007, in Stellar Relaxation Processes, 2007 STScI Spring Symposium, (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press) in press, arXiv:0708.0688 · arXiv
  2. Binney, J. J., & Tremaine, S. 1987, in Galactic Dynamics, (Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press)
  3. Cuesta-Albertos, J. A., Cuevas, A., & Fraiman, R. 2007, Statistics and Computing, in press, http://personales.unican.es/cuestaj/Sphericity.pdf
  4. Gillessen, S., et al. 2006, Proc. SPIE, 6268E, 33
  5. Hofmann, R., Blietz, M., Duhoux, P., Eckart, A., Krabbe, A., & Rotaciuc, V 1992, Proc. ESO Contributions on Progress in Telescope and Instrumenta- tion, ed. M. H. Ulrich (Garching: ESO) 617
  6. Lenzen, R., Hofmann, R., Bizenberger, P., & Tusche, A. 1998, Proc. SPIE, 3354, 606
  7. Rank, S. 2007, MSc thesis, MPE
  8. Rousset, G., et al. 1998, Proc. SPIE, 3353, 508

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gillessen, S., Eisenhauer, F., Trippe, S., Alexander, T., Genzel, R., Martins, F., & Ott, T.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics (DE)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2009-02-20
Volume
692
Issue
2
Pages
1075-1109
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2110284565
Cited by
1,779
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 86 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 178 · 2018: 115 · 2017: 92 · 2016: 140 · 2015: 125 · 2014: 120 · 2013: 137 · 2012: 110
FWCI
61.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
Sgr A*, Galactic Center, stellar orbits, S2 star, black hole mass, galactocentric distance, dark matter, disk rotation, systematic errors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review