The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What Is Field Theory?
Abstract
Field theory is a more or less coherent approach in the social sciences whose essence is the explanation of regularities in individual action by recourse to position vis‐à‐vis others. Position in the field indicates the potential for a force exerted on the person, but a force that impinges “from the inside” as opposed to external compulsion. Motivation is accordingly considered to be the paramount example of social structure in action, as opposed to a residue of chance or freedom. While field theory is often castigated for its necessarily tautological definition, this may be far more of an advantage than a defect. Field theory offers social scientists a combination of analytical insight and attention to the concrete; further, the implicit definition of “explanation” that it brings is one that, unlike conventional sociological definitions, is internally consistent and in accord with everyday usage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition
Gibson, J. J. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315740218 · Cited by 12,132
Hutchins, E. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 · Cited by 10,801
The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor
Abbott, A. (1988) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226189666.001.0001 · Cited by 7,733
The role set: problems in sociological theory
Merton, R. K. (1957) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/587363 · Cited by 947
Social Structure from Multiple Networks. II. Role Structures
Boorman, S. A., & White, H. C. (1976) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226228 · Cited by 788
Transcending General Linear Reality
Abbott, A. (1988) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.2307/202114 · Cited by 716
Studies in spatial learning. I. Orientation and the short-cut.
Tolman, E. C., Ritchie, B. F., & Kalish, D. (1946) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0053944 · Cited by 318
Cited by
Toward a General Theory of Strategic Action Fields
Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2011) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01385.x · Cited by 1,367
Motivation and justification: a dual process model of culture in action.
Vaisey, S. (2009) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/597179 · Cited by 1,279
The Emergence of Organizations and Markets
Padgett, J. F., & Powell, W. W. (2012) · doi:10.23943/princeton/9780691148670.001.0001 · Cited by 745
Conceptualizing Historical Organization Studies
Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Clegg, S. R. (2016) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0133 · Cited by 410
Capitals, assets, and resources: some critical issues 1
Savage, M., Warde, A., & Devine, F. (2005) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00045.x · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, J. L.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-49
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W1543353770
- Cited by
- 986
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 37.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What Is Field Theory? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/375201
- The paper
- Martin, J. L. (2003). What Is Field Theory? American Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1086/375201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.