Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 880

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

First‐Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) Observations: The Angular Power Spectrum

Open access
Hinshaw, G., Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Hill, R. S., Meyer, S. S., Barnes, C., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., Komatsu, E., Limon, M., Page, L., Tucker, G. S., Weiland, J. L., Wollack, E., Wright, E. L.·2003·The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series

Abstract

We present the angular power spectrum derived from the first-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) sky maps. We study a variety of power spectrum estimation methods and data combinations and demonstrate that the results are robust. The data are modestly contaminated by diffuse Galactic foreground emission, but we show that a simple Galactic template model is sufficient to remove the signal. Point sources produce a modest contamination in the low frequency data. After masking ~700 known bright sources from the maps, we estimate residual sources contribute ~3500 uK^2 at 41 GHz, and ~130 uK^2 at 94 GHz, to the power spectrum l*(l+1)*C_l/(2*pi) at l=1000. Systematic errors are negligible compared to the (modest) level of foreground emission. Our best estimate of the power spectrum is derived from 28 cross-power spectra of statistically independent channels. The final spectrum is essentially independent of the noise properties of an individual radiometer. The resulting spectrum provides a definitive measurement of the CMB power spectrum, with uncertainties limited by cosmic variance, up to l~350. The spectrum clearly exhibits a first acoustic peak at l=220 and a second acoustic peak at l~540 and it provides strong support for adiabatic initial conditions. Kogut et al. (2003) analyze the C_l^TE power spectrum, and present evidence for a relatively high optical depth, and an early period of cosmic reionization. Among other things, this implies that the temperature power spectrum has been suppressed by \~30% on degree angular scales, due to secondary scattering.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/377225

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 880

Metadata

Authors
Hinshaw, G., Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Hill, R. S., Meyer, S. S., Barnes, C., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., Komatsu, E., Limon, M., Page, L., Tucker, G. S., Weiland, J. L., Wollack, E., & Wright, E. L.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
Published
2003-09
Volume
148
Issue
1
Pages
135-159
ISSN
  • 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4365
OpenAlex
W1986264263
Cited by
880
References
3
FWCI
70.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: First‐Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) Observations: The Angular Power Spectrum. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/377225
The paper
Hinshaw, G., Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Hill, R. S., Meyer, S. S., Barnes, C., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., Komatsu, E., Limon, M., Page, L., Tucker, G. S., Weiland, J. L., Wollack, E., & Wright, E. L. (2003). First‐Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) Observations: The Angular Power Spectrum. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.1086/377225

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.