Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 245

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Study of the Afterglows of Four Gamma‐Ray Bursts: Constraining the Explosion and Fireball Model

Open access
Yost, S. A., Harrison, F. A., Sari, R., Frail, D. A.·2003·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We employ a fireball model of the gamma-ray burst (GRB) explosion to constrain intrinsic and environmental parameters of four events with good broadband afterglow data: GRB 970508, GRB 980329, GRB 980703, and GRB 000926. Using the standard assumptions of constant circumburst density and no evolution of the fraction of the explosion energy in the postshock magnetic field, we investigate the uniformity of the derived explosion and shock physics parameters among these events. We find a variety of parameters: densities that range from those of the interstellar mediumto diffuse clouds, energies comparable to the total GRB gamma-ray energy, collimations from near-isotropy to 0.04 radians, substantial electron energy fractions of 10%-30% with energy distribution indices of 2.1-2.9, and magnetic energy fractions from 0.2% to 25%. We also investigate the level to which the data constrain the standard model assumptions, such as the magnetic field evolution, and the allowed density profiles of the medium. Fits generally improve slightly with an increasing magnetic energy fraction B . Good fits can be produced with magnetic energy accumulating or decaying with the shock strength over the afterglow as B ∝ γ x (-2 ≤ x ≤ +1). The data are not very sensitive to increasing density profiles, allowing good fits even with density ∝ r 10 . Some parameter values change by up to an order of magnitude under such altered assumptions; the parameters of even good fits cannot be taken at face value. The data are sensitive to decreasing densities: r -2 profiles may produce reasonable fits, but steeper profiles, even r -2.5 , will not fit the data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/378288

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 245

Metadata

Authors
Yost, S. A., Harrison, F. A., Sari, R., & Frail, D. A.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2003-11
Volume
597
Issue
1
Pages
459-473
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1980278891
Cited by
245
References
2
FWCI
9.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Study of the Afterglows of Four Gamma‐Ray Bursts: Constraining the Explosion and Fireball Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/378288
The paper
Yost, S. A., Harrison, F. A., Sari, R., & Frail, D. A. (2003). A Study of the Afterglows of Four Gamma‐Ray Bursts: Constraining the Explosion and Fireball Model. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/378288

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.