The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Study of the Afterglows of Four Gamma‐Ray Bursts: Constraining the Explosion and Fireball Model
Open accessAbstract
We employ a fireball model of the gamma-ray burst (GRB) explosion to constrain intrinsic and environmental parameters of four events with good broadband afterglow data: GRB 970508, GRB 980329, GRB 980703, and GRB 000926. Using the standard assumptions of constant circumburst density and no evolution of the fraction of the explosion energy in the postshock magnetic field, we investigate the uniformity of the derived explosion and shock physics parameters among these events. We find a variety of parameters: densities that range from those of the interstellar mediumto diffuse clouds, energies comparable to the total GRB gamma-ray energy, collimations from near-isotropy to 0.04 radians, substantial electron energy fractions of 10%-30% with energy distribution indices of 2.1-2.9, and magnetic energy fractions from 0.2% to 25%. We also investigate the level to which the data constrain the standard model assumptions, such as the magnetic field evolution, and the allowed density profiles of the medium. Fits generally improve slightly with an increasing magnetic energy fraction B . Good fits can be produced with magnetic energy accumulating or decaying with the shock strength over the afterglow as B ∝ γ x (-2 ≤ x ≤ +1). The data are not very sensitive to increasing density profiles, allowing good fits even with density ∝ r 10 . Some parameter values change by up to an order of magnitude under such altered assumptions; the parameters of even good fits cannot be taken at face value. The data are sensitive to decreasing densities: r -2 profiles may produce reasonable fits, but steeper profiles, even r -2.5 , will not fit the data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305772 · Cited by 15,126
Fluid dynamics of relativistic blast waves
Blandford, R. D., & McKee, C. F. (1976) · The Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/1.861619 · Cited by 1,215
Cited by
Zhang, B., Fan, Y. Z., Dyks, J., Kobayashi, S., Meszaros, P., Burrows, D. N., Nousek, J. A., & Gehrels, N. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/500723 · Cited by 1,079
The physics of gamma-ray bursts & relativistic jets
Kumar, P., & Zhang, B. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.008 · Cited by 952
GAMMA-RAY BURSTS: PROGRESS, PROBLEMS & PROSPECTS
ZHANG, B., & MÉSZÁROS, P. (2004) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x0401746x · Cited by 783
Fong, W., Berger, E., Margutti, R., & Zauderer, B. A. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/815/2/102 · Cited by 532
The Early X‐Ray Emission from GRBs
O’Brien, P. T., Willingale, R., Osborne, J., Goad, M. R., Page, K. L., Vaughan, S., Rol, E., Beardmore, A., Godet, O., Hurkett, C. P., et al. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/505457 · Cited by 414
Metadata
- Authors
- Yost, S. A., Harrison, F. A., Sari, R., & Frail, D. A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 597
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 459-473
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1980278891
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Study of the Afterglows of Four Gamma‐Ray Bursts: Constraining the Explosion and Fireball Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/378288
- The paper
- Yost, S. A., Harrison, F. A., Sari, R., & Frail, D. A. (2003). A Study of the Afterglows of Four Gamma‐Ray Bursts: Constraining the Explosion and Fireball Model. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/378288
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.