The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Statistical Properties of Collisionless Equal‐ and Unequal‐Mass Merger Remnants of Disk Galaxies
Open accessAbstract
We perform a large parameter survey of collisionless N -body simulations of binary mergers of disk galaxies with mass ratios of 1 : 1, 2 : 1, 3 : 1, and 4 : 1, using the special-purpose hardware GRAPE. A set of 112 merger simulations is used to investigate the fundamental statistical properties of merger remnants as a function of the initial orientation and mass ratio of the progenitor disks. The photometric and kinematical properties of the simulated merger remnants are analyzed. The methods used to determine the characteristic properties are equivalent to the methods used for observations of giant elliptical galaxies. We take projection effects into account and analyze the remnant properties in a statistical way for comparison with observations. The basic properties of the remnants correlate with the mass ratio of the progenitor disks. We find that about 80% of the equal-mass merger simulations lead to slowly rotating merger remnants having * < 0.4. Observers would interpret those objects as being supported by anisotropic velocity dispersions. All 1 : 1 remnants show significant minor-axis rotation. Half of all projected 1 : 1 remnants show boxy ( a 4 < 0) isophotes, and the other half show disky ( a 4 > 0) isophotes. A distinct subclass of 4 out of 12 initial orientations leads to purely boxy remnants independent of orientation. The 1 : 1 mergers with other initial orientations show disky or boxy isophotes, depending on the viewing angle. Remnants with mass ratios of 3 : 1 and 4 : 1 have more homogeneous properties. They all rotate rapidly (maximum value of v /σ = 1.2) and show a small amount of minor-axis rotation, consistent with models of isotropic or slightly anisotropic oblate rotators. If observed in projection, they would be interpreted as being supported by rotation. About 90% of the projected 3 : 1 and 4 : 1 remnants show disky isophotes. The 2 : 1 remnants show intermediate properties. Projection effects lead to a large spread in the data, in good agreement with observations. They do not change the fundamental kinematical differences between equal- and unequal-mass merger remnants. The correlation between isophotal twist and apparent ellipticity of every single merger remnant is in good agreement with observations. The amount of twisting strongly depends on the orientation of the remnant but is only weakly dependent on the mass ratio of the merger. The results of this study weaken the disk merger scenario as the possible formation mechanism of massive boxy giant ellipticals, as only equal-mass mergers with special initial orientations can produce purely boxy anisotropic merger remnants. Some orientations of 1 : 1 mergers can even lead to disky and anisotropic remnants that are either not observed or would be classified as S0 galaxies based on their morphology. In general, the properties of equal-mass (and 2 : 1) merger remnants are consistent with those of the observed population of giant ellipticals in the intermediate-mass regime between low-mass, fast-rotating, disky and bright, massive, boxy giant ellipticals. The 3 : 1 and 4 : 1 merger remnants, however, are in very good agreement with the class of low-luminosity, fast-rotating giant elliptical galaxies. Binary mergers of disk galaxies are therefore still very good candidates for being the main formation mechanism for intermediate- and low-mass giant ellipticals. The homogeneous class of massive boxy ellipticals most likely formed by a different process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An analytical model for spherical galaxies and bulges
Hernquist, L. (1990) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/168845 · Cited by 3,126
Toomre, A., & Toomre, J. (1972) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/151823 · Cited by 2,555
Spectral evolution of stellar populations using isochrone synthesis
Bruzual A., G., & Charlot, S. (1993) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/172385 · Cited by 1,808
Transformations of Galaxies. II. Gasdynamics in Merging Disk Galaxies
Barnes, J. E., & Hernquist, L. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/177957 · Cited by 1,347
The Centers of Early-Type Galaxies with HST. IV. Central Parameter Relations.
Faber, S. M., Tremaine, S., Ajhar, E. A., Byun, Y.-I., Dressler, A., Gebhardt, K., Grillmair, C., Kormendy, J., Lauer, T. R., & Richstone, D. (1997) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/118606 · Cited by 772
The Centers of Early-Type Galaxies with HST.I.An Observational Survey
Lauer, T. R., Ajhar, E. A., Byun, Y.-I., Dressler, A., Faber, S. M., Grillmair, C., Kormendy, J., Richstone, D., & Tremaine, S. (1995) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/117719 · Cited by 644
N-body realizations of compound galaxies
Hernquist, L. (1993) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/191784 · Cited by 489
The Homogeneity of Spheroidal Populations in Distant Clusters
Ellis, R. S., Smail, I. R., Dressler, A. M., Couch, W. J., Oemler, A., Butcher, H. R., & Sharples, R. M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/304261 · Cited by 414
The age of elliptical galaxies and bulges in a merger model
Kauffmann, G. (1996) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/281.2.487 · Cited by 391
Formation of gas discs in merging galaxies
Barnes, J. E. (2002) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05335.x · Cited by 391
Cited by
The Epochs of Early‐Type Galaxy Formation as a Function of Environment
Thomas, D., Maraston, C., Bender, R., & de Oliveira, C. M. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/426932 · Cited by 1,620
Galactic star formation and accretion histories from matching galaxies to dark matter haloes
Moster, B. P., Naab, T., & White, S. D. M. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sts261 · Cited by 1,431
Self-citationGuo, Q., White, S., Boylan-Kolchin, M., De Lucia, G., Kauffmann, G., Lemson, G., Li, C., Springel, V., & Weinmann, S. (2011) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18114.x · Cited by 1,205
Theoretical Challenges in Galaxy Formation
Naab, T., & Ostriker, J. P. (2017) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040019 · Cited by 722
Self-citationStructure and Formation of Elliptical and Spheroidal Galaxies
Bender, R. (2016) · doi:10.15781/t28g8fm0v · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Naab, T., & Burkert, A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2003-11-10
- Volume
- 597
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 893-906
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2046928649
- Cited by
- 437
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 13.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Statistical Properties of Collisionless Equal‐ and Unequal‐Mass Merger Remnants of Disk Galaxies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/378581
- The paper
- Naab, T., & Burkert, A. (2003). Statistical Properties of Collisionless Equal‐ and Unequal‐Mass Merger Remnants of Disk Galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/378581
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.