The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumer and Market Drivers of the Trial Probability of New Consumer Packaged Goods
Open accessAbstract
We examine the effect of consumer and market factors on the trial probability of new consumer packaged goods. We distinguish between three sources of variation in consumer trial probability: (1) within new products, across consumers; (2) within new products, over time; and (3) across new products. Hypotheses are developed for the different variables concerning their likely effect on trial probability. The hypotheses are tested on weekly household-panel scanner data on the occurrence and timing of first purchases for 239 new consumer packaged goods over a 52-week period after introduction for a sample of over 3,500 consumers. We combine these household panel purchase data with consumer questionnaire data, retail scanner data, data on advertising expenditure, and expert ratings. We find support for most hypotheses. One of our main findings is that the effects of the consumers' personal makeup on the probability that they will try the new product are systematically moderated by elements of the marketing strategy associated with the new product and by category characteristics. The extensive data set provides a strong context for the generalizability of the findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance
Klein, B., & Leffler, K. B. (1981) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260996 · Cited by 3,653
Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement
Midgley, D. F., & Dowling, G. R. (1978) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208701 · Cited by 1,550
Information Load and Consumer Decision Making
Malhotra, N. K. (1982) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208882 · Cited by 778
Investigating Household Purchase Timing Decisions: A Conditional Hazard Function Approach
Jain, D. C., & Vilcassim, N. J. (1991) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.10.1.1 · Cited by 270
Cited by
Striatal activity underlies novelty-based choice in humans
Wittmann, B. C., Daw, N. D., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.027 · Cited by 277
Novak, T. P., & Hoffman, D. L. (2009) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/596026 · Cited by 200
Bartels, J., & Reinders, M. J. (2010) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.08.016 · Cited by 157
Susceptibility to and impact of interpersonal influence in an investment context
Hoffmann, A. O. I., & Broekhuizen, T. L. J. (2009) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-008-0128-7 · Cited by 122
Rethinking determinants of ICT acceptance: towards an integrated and comprehensive overview
Verdegem, P., & De Marez, L. (2011) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2011.02.004 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Gielens, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 368-384
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W3122371735
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 17.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumer and Market Drivers of the Trial Probability of New Consumer Packaged Goods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/378615
- The paper
- Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Gielens, K. (2003). Consumer and Market Drivers of the Trial Probability of New Consumer Packaged Goods. Journal of Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/378615
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.