The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantifying the Bimodal Color‐Magnitude Distribution of Galaxies
Open accessAbstract
We analyze the bivariate distribution, in color versus absolute magnitude ( u-r vs. M r ), of a low-redshift sample of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (2400 deg 2 , 0.004 < z < 0.08, -23.5 < M r < -15.5). We trace the bimodality of the distribution from luminous to faint galaxies by fitting double Gaussians to the color functions separated in absolute magnitude bins. Color-magnitude (CM) relations are obtained for red and blue distributions (early- and late-type, predominantly field, galaxies) without using any cut in morphology. Instead, the analysis is based on the assumption of normal Gaussian distributions in color. We find that the CM relations are well fitted by a straight line plus a tanh function. Both relations can be described by a shallow CM trend (slopes of about -0.04, -0.05) plus a steeper transition in the average galaxy properties over about 2 mag. The midpoints of the transitions ( M r = -19.8 and -20.8 for the red and blue distributions, respectively) occur around 2 × 10 10 ☉ after converting luminosities to stellar mass. Separate luminosity functions are obtained for the two distributions. The red distribution has a more luminous characteristic magnitude and a shallower faint-end slope ( M * = -21.5, α = -0.8) compared to the blue distribution (α ≈ -1.3, depending on the parameterization). These are approximately converted to galaxy stellar mass functions. The red distribution galaxies have a higher number density per magnitude for masses greater than about 3 × 10 10 ☉ . Using a simple merger model, we show that the differences between the two functions are consistent with the red distribution being formed from major galaxy mergers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305772 · Cited by 15,126
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric System
Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E., Doi, M., Shimasaku, K., & Schneider, D. P. (1996) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/117915 · Cited by 3,033 · cited 1×
“Observations with a 0.5-m photometric telescope (Hogg et al. 2001) are used to calibrate the 2.5-m telescope images using the u′g′r′i′z′ standard star system (Fukugita et al. 1996; Smith et al. 2002).”
MethodInfluentialThe Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric Camera
Gunn, J. E., Carr, M., Rockosi, C., Sekiguchi, M., Berry, K., Elms, B., de Haas, E., Ivezić, Ž., Knapp, G., Lupton, R., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300645 · Cited by 1,692
Self-citationAstrometric Calibration of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
Pier, J. R., Munn, J. A., Hindsley, R. B., Hennessy, G. S., Kent, S. M., Lupton, R. H., & Ivezić, Ž. (2003) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/346138 · Cited by 908
Self-citationBudavari, T., Connolly, A. J., Szalay, A. S., Szapudi, I., Csabai, I., Scranton, R., Bahcall, N. A., Brinkmann, J., Eisenstein, D. J., Frieman, J. A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/377168 · Cited by 135
Self-citation
Cited by
Star Formation in the Milky Way and Nearby Galaxies
Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. (2012) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610 · Cited by 2,902
“…of the star formation history of a galaxy has been long recognized (e.g., Gavazzi & Scodeggio 1996), but data from SDSS and subsequent surveys have reshaped our picture of the population of star-forming galaxies (e.g., Kauffmann et al. 2003; Baldry et al. 2004, 2006; Brinchmann et al. 2004).”
BackgroundLintott, C. J., Schawinski, K., Slosar, A., Land, K., Bamford, S., Thomas, D., Raddick, M. J., Nichol, R. C., Szalay, A., Andreescu, D., et al. (2008) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13689.x · Cited by 1,488
Self-citationHaynes, M. P., Giovanelli, R., Martin, A. M., Hess, K. M., Saintonge, A., Adams, E. A. K., Hallenbeck, G., Hoffman, G. L., Huang, S., Kent, B. R., et al. (2011) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/142/5/170 · Cited by 678
Astrophysics with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna
Amaro-Seoane, P., Andrews, J., Arca Sedda, M., Askar, A., Baghi, Q., Balasov, R., Bartos, I., Bavera, S. S., Bellovary, J., Berry, C. P. L., et al. (2023) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-022-00041-y · Cited by 609
Structure and Formation of Elliptical and Spheroidal Galaxies
Bender, R. (2016) · doi:10.15781/t28g8fm0v · Cited by 555
Metadata
- Authors
- Baldry, I. K., Glazebrook, K., Brinkmann, J., Ivezić, Ž., Lupton, R. H., Nichol, R. C., & Szalay, A. S.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2004-01-10
- Volume
- 600
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 681-694
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2153037851
- Cited by
- 1,569
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 36.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying the Bimodal Color‐Magnitude Distribution of Galaxies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/380092
- The paper
- Baldry, I. K., Glazebrook, K., Brinkmann, J., Ivezić, Ž., Lupton, R. H., Nichol, R. C., & Szalay, A. S. (2004). Quantifying the Bimodal Color‐Magnitude Distribution of Galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/380092
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.