Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,569

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantifying the Bimodal Color‐Magnitude Distribution of Galaxies

Open access
Baldry, Ivan K., Glazebrook, Karl, Brinkmann, Jon, Ivezić, Željko, Lupton, Robert H., Nichol, Robert C., Szalay, Alexander S.·2004·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We analyze the bivariate distribution, in color versus absolute magnitude ( u-r vs. M r ), of a low-redshift sample of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (2400 deg 2 , 0.004 < z < 0.08, -23.5 < M r < -15.5). We trace the bimodality of the distribution from luminous to faint galaxies by fitting double Gaussians to the color functions separated in absolute magnitude bins. Color-magnitude (CM) relations are obtained for red and blue distributions (early- and late-type, predominantly field, galaxies) without using any cut in morphology. Instead, the analysis is based on the assumption of normal Gaussian distributions in color. We find that the CM relations are well fitted by a straight line plus a tanh function. Both relations can be described by a shallow CM trend (slopes of about -0.04, -0.05) plus a steeper transition in the average galaxy properties over about 2 mag. The midpoints of the transitions ( M r = -19.8 and -20.8 for the red and blue distributions, respectively) occur around 2 × 10 10 ☉ after converting luminosities to stellar mass. Separate luminosity functions are obtained for the two distributions. The red distribution has a more luminous characteristic magnitude and a shallower faint-end slope ( M * = -21.5, α = -0.8) compared to the blue distribution (α ≈ -1.3, depending on the parameterization). These are approximately converted to galaxy stellar mass functions. The red distribution galaxies have a higher number density per magnitude for masses greater than about 3 × 10 10 ☉ . Using a simple merger model, we show that the differences between the two functions are consistent with the red distribution being formed from major galaxy mergers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/380092

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 1,569

Metadata

Authors
Baldry, I. K., Glazebrook, K., Brinkmann, J., Ivezić, Ž., Lupton, R. H., Nichol, R. C., & Szalay, A. S.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2004-01-10
Volume
600
Issue
2
Pages
681-694
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2153037851
Cited by
1,569
References
5
FWCI
36.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying the Bimodal Color‐Magnitude Distribution of Galaxies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/380092
The paper
Baldry, I. K., Glazebrook, K., Brinkmann, J., Ivezić, Ž., Lupton, R. H., Nichol, R. C., & Szalay, A. S. (2004). Quantifying the Bimodal Color‐Magnitude Distribution of Galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/380092

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.