The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Twenty‐Three High‐Redshift Supernovae from the Institute for Astronomy Deep Survey: Doubling the Supernova Sample at z> 0.7
Open accessAbstract
We present photometric and spectroscopic observations of 23 high-redshift supernovae (SNe) spanning a range of z = 0.34-1.03, nine of which are unambiguously classified as Type Ia. These SNe were discovered during the IfA Deep Survey, which began in 2001 September and observed a total of 2.5 deg 2 to a depth of approximately m ≈ 25-26 in RIZ over 9-17 visits, typically every 1-3 weeks for nearly 5 months, with additional observations continuing until 2002 April. We give a brief description of the survey motivations, observational strategy, and reduction process. This sample of 23 high-redshift SNe includes 15 at z ≥ 0.7, doubling the published number of objects at these redshifts, and indicates that the evidence for acceleration of the universe is not due to a systematic effect proportional to redshift. In combination with the recent compilation of Tonry et al. (2003), we calculate cosmological parameter density contours that are consistent with the flat universe indicated by the cosmic microwave background (Spergel et al. 2003). Adopting the constraint that Ω total = 1.0, we obtain best-fit values of (Ω m ,Ω Λ ) = (0.33, 0.67) using 22 SNe from this survey augmented by the literature compilation. We show that using the empty-beam model for gravitational lensing does not eliminate the need for Ω Λ > 0. Experience from this survey indicates great potential for similar large-scale surveys while also revealing the limitations of performing surveys for z > 1 SNe from the ground.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Challis, P., Clocchiatti, A., Diercks, A., Garnavich, P. M., Gilliland, R. L., Hogan, C. J., Jha, S., Kirshner, R. P., et al. (1998) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/300499 · Cited by 19,704
Self-citationMeasurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High‐Redshift Supernovae
Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., Knop, R. A., Nugent, P., Castro, P. G., Deustua, S., Fabbro, S., Goobar, A., Groom, D. E., et al. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/307221 · Cited by 18,062
Self-citationSchlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305772 · Cited by 15,126
Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377226 · Cited by 10,976
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Photometric System
Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E., Doi, M., Shimasaku, K., & Schneider, D. P. (1996) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/117915 · Cited by 3,033
The absolute magnitudes of Type IA supernovae
Phillips, M. M. (1993) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/186970 · Cited by 2,111
Cited by
FIVE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Komatsu, E., Dunkley, J., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D., Limon, M., Page, L., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/330 · Cited by 5,786
Sotiriou, T. P., & Faraoni, V. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.451 · Cited by 4,519
Riess, A. G., Strolger, L., Tonry, J., Casertano, S., Ferguson, H. C., Mobasher, B., Challis, P., Filippenko, A. V., Jha, S., Li, W., et al. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/383612 · Cited by 4,315
“Alam et al. (2004) use a significant number of SNe that would fail our selection criteria of our gold sample, including 26 SNe from the SCP (now excluded or flagged by Knop et al. 2003) and another 13 from Barris et al. (2004) of dubious reliability.”
InfluentialSelf-citationRiess, A. G., Strolger, L., Casertano, S., Ferguson, H. C., Mobasher, B., Gold, B., Challis, P. J., Filippenko, A. V., Jha, S., Li, W., et al. (2007) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/510378 · Cited by 1,758
Self-citationImproved Cosmological Constraints from New, Old, and Combined Supernova Data Sets
Kowalski, M., Rubin, D., Aldering, G., Agostinho, R. J., Amadon, A., Amanullah, R., Balland, C., Barbary, K., Blanc, G., Challis, P. J., et al. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/589937 · Cited by 1,540
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Barris, B. J., Tonry, J. L., Blondin, S., Challis, P., Chornock, R., Clocchiatti, A., Filippenko, A. V., Garnavich, P., Holland, S. T., Jha, S., Kirshner, R. P., Krisciunas, K., Leibundgut, B., Li, W., Matheson, T., Miknaitis, G., Riess, A. G., Schmidt, B. P., Smith, R. C., Sollerman, J., Spyromilio, J., Stubbs, C. W., Suntzeff, N. B., Aussel, H., Chambers, K. C., Connelley, M. S., Donovan, D., Henry, J. P., Kaiser, N., Liu, M. C., Martin, E. L., & Wainscoat, R. J.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2004-02-20
- Volume
- 602
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 571-594
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2043810482
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 42.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Twenty‐Three High‐Redshift Supernovae from the Institute for Astronomy Deep Survey: Doubling the Supernova Sample at z> 0.7. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/381122
- The paper
- Barris, B. J., Tonry, J. L., Blondin, S., Challis, P., Chornock, R., Clocchiatti, A., Filippenko, A. V., Garnavich, P., Holland, S. T., Jha, S., Kirshner, R. P., Krisciunas, K., Leibundgut, B., Li, W., Matheson, T., Miknaitis, G., Riess, A. G., Schmidt, B. P., Smith, R. C., . . . Wainscoat, R. J. (2004). Twenty‐Three High‐Redshift Supernovae from the Institute for Astronomy Deep Survey: Doubling the Supernova Sample at z> 0.7. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/381122
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
