The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Worker Reproduction in the Higher Eusocial Hymenoptera
Abstract
Worker reproduction (i.e., the parthenogenetic production by workers of males and, more rarely, females) is very widespread in the higher eusocial Hymenoptera (bumble bees, stinglees bees, honey bees, vespine wasps, higher ants). Examples are given in the text. The mutualistic theory ("hopeful reproductive" hypothesis) of hymenopteran eusociality (semisocial route) states that the first workers were reproductive because the possibility of future reproduction was the condition for their originally working. In Hamilton's kinship theory (subsocial route) workers produce males on account of their greater relatedness to sons than to brothers. Several recent models indicate that worker male production could have facilitated the evolution of eusociality. Queen control (queen inhibition of worker fertility) arises because queens are more closely related to their own than to workers' offspring, and explains why present-day workers are most reproductive in queenless conditions. Conversely worker reproduction in queenright colonies (i.e., colonies containing the maternal queen) reflects selection on workers to evade queen control Optimization models predict that workers should produce all or none of a colony's males. Although workers in some species produce 100 per cent of the males, reproductive workers more usually produce an extremely variable proportion of males. When workers reproduce, the expected equilibrium sex ratios change; but the information needed to assess the importance for sex-ratio determination of worker male production is lacking. Kinship theory suggests that polygyny (multiple queens) and multimple mating both promote queeright worker reproduction by reducing intracolony genetic relatedness. The analysis of data assembled on 49 ant species reveals that workers in monogynous species (i.e., with one queen per colony) reproduce moslty in queenless conditions, whereas those in polygynous species reproduce in queenless and queenright conditions equally often, in agreement with kinship theory. Monogyny could favor a reproductive worker caste becuse the high probability of colony orphanage allows workers greater opportunity to reproduce free from queen control. The ability of workers to reproduce has important consequence for colony organization and function. These include (1) the extent and nature of queen control of worker fertility, such control being viewed as the outcome of an "arms race" with workers over male parentage; (2) the occurrence of dominance behavior, egg cannibalism, brood destruction, and possibly even matricide in colonies with reproductive workers; (3) reduced colony efficiency and the system of temporal division of labor based on worker age and ovarian development; and(4) the rarity of physical castes among workers. For all these reasons, worker reproduction is crucial to our understanding of hymenopteran eusociality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
Wilson, E. O. (1971) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,756
The Evolution of Social Behavior
Alexander, R. D. (1974) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001545 · Cited by 3,854
Arms races between and within species
Dawkins, R., & Krebs, J. R. (1979) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1979.0081 · Cited by 2,180
Caste and ecology in the social insects
Brian, M. V. (1979) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/0003-3472(79)90042-3 · Cited by 1,868
The Social Behavior of the Bees
Michener, C. D. (1974) · Cited by 1,732
Trivers, R. L., & Hare, H. (1976) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1108197 · Cited by 1,247
The number of queens: An important trait in ant evolution
H�lldobler, B., & Wilson, E. O. (1977) · Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/bf00439886 · Cited by 590
Wheeler, D. E. (1986) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284536 · Cited by 568
Evolution of Sociality in Insects
Lin, N., & Michener, C. D. (1972) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/407216 · Cited by 427
Cited by
Worker policing in the honeybee
Ratnieks, F. L. W., & Visscher, P. K. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/342796a0 · Cited by 573
Ratnieks, F. L. W., & Reeve, H. K. (1992) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80647-2 · Cited by 342
Boomsma, J. J., & Gawne, R. (2018) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12330 · Cited by 304
Relatedness and the fraternal major transitions
Queller, D. C. (2000) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2000.0727 · Cited by 301
Social life: the paradox of multiple-queen colonies
Keller, L. (1995) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(00)89133-8 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Venue
- The Quarterly Review of Biology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1988-09
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 291-311
- ISSN
- 0033-5770 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-7718
- OpenAlex
- W1994386159
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 6.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Worker Reproduction in the Higher Eusocial Hymenoptera. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/415930
- The paper
- Worker Reproduction in the Higher Eusocial Hymenoptera. (1988). The Quarterly Review of Biology. https://doi.org/10.1086/415930
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.