Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 388

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Worker Reproduction in the Higher Eusocial Hymenoptera

·1988·The Quarterly Review of Biology

Abstract

Worker reproduction (i.e., the parthenogenetic production by workers of males and, more rarely, females) is very widespread in the higher eusocial Hymenoptera (bumble bees, stinglees bees, honey bees, vespine wasps, higher ants). Examples are given in the text. The mutualistic theory ("hopeful reproductive" hypothesis) of hymenopteran eusociality (semisocial route) states that the first workers were reproductive because the possibility of future reproduction was the condition for their originally working. In Hamilton's kinship theory (subsocial route) workers produce males on account of their greater relatedness to sons than to brothers. Several recent models indicate that worker male production could have facilitated the evolution of eusociality. Queen control (queen inhibition of worker fertility) arises because queens are more closely related to their own than to workers' offspring, and explains why present-day workers are most reproductive in queenless conditions. Conversely worker reproduction in queenright colonies (i.e., colonies containing the maternal queen) reflects selection on workers to evade queen control Optimization models predict that workers should produce all or none of a colony's males. Although workers in some species produce 100 per cent of the males, reproductive workers more usually produce an extremely variable proportion of males. When workers reproduce, the expected equilibrium sex ratios change; but the information needed to assess the importance for sex-ratio determination of worker male production is lacking. Kinship theory suggests that polygyny (multiple queens) and multimple mating both promote queeright worker reproduction by reducing intracolony genetic relatedness. The analysis of data assembled on 49 ant species reveals that workers in monogynous species (i.e., with one queen per colony) reproduce moslty in queenless conditions, whereas those in polygynous species reproduce in queenless and queenright conditions equally often, in agreement with kinship theory. Monogyny could favor a reproductive worker caste becuse the high probability of colony orphanage allows workers greater opportunity to reproduce free from queen control. The ability of workers to reproduce has important consequence for colony organization and function. These include (1) the extent and nature of queen control of worker fertility, such control being viewed as the outcome of an "arms race" with workers over male parentage; (2) the occurrence of dominance behavior, egg cannibalism, brood destruction, and possibly even matricide in colonies with reproductive workers; (3) reduced colony efficiency and the system of temporal division of labor based on worker age and ovarian development; and(4) the rarity of physical castes among workers. For all these reasons, worker reproduction is crucial to our understanding of hymenopteran eusociality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/415930

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 388

Metadata

Venue
The Quarterly Review of Biology
Published
1988-09
Volume
63
Issue
3
Pages
291-311
ISSN
  • 0033-5770 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-7718
OpenAlex
W1994386159
Cited by
388
References
27
FWCI
6.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Worker Reproduction in the Higher Eusocial Hymenoptera. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/415930
The paper
Worker Reproduction in the Higher Eusocial Hymenoptera. (1988). The Quarterly Review of Biology. https://doi.org/10.1086/415930

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.