Cited by 301Evolutionary Game Theory and CooperationEvolution and Genetic DynamicsInsect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior

Relatedness and the fraternal major transitions

Open access
Queller, David C.·2000·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Many of the major transitions in evolution involved the coalescence of independent lower–level units into a higher organismal level. This paper examines the role of kinship, focusing on the transitions to multicellularity in animals and to coloniality in insects. In both, kin selection based on high relatedness permitted cooperation and a reproductive division of labour. The higher relatedness of haplodiploid females to their sisters than to their offspring might not have been crucial in the origin of insect societies, and the transition to multicellularity shows that such special relationships are not required. When multicellular forms develop from a single cell, selfish conflict is minimal because each selfish mutant obtains only one generation of within–individual advantage in a chimaera. Conditionally expressed traits are particularly immune to within–individual selfishness because such mutations are rarely expressed in chimaeras. Such conditionally expressed altruism genes lead easily to the evolution of the soma, and the germ line might simply be what is left over. In most social insects, differences in relatedness ensure that there will be potential conflicts. Power asymmetries sometimes lead to such decisive settlements of conflicts that social insect colonies can be considered to be fully organismal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2000.0727

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a vast array of possible multicellular forms involving multiple species.

    “We note that this definition does not explicitly require groups to be formed of the same species, and indeed, there is a vast array of possible multicellular forms involving multiple species [190–192].”

    From Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems (2024) · cites this paper as [190]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Queller, D. C.
Affiliations
Rice University (US)
Corresponding author
Queller, David C.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Published
2000-11-29
Volume
355
Issue
1403
Pages
1647-1655
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2155987626
Cited by
301
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
8.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Keywords
relatedness, major transitions, kin selection, multicellularity, coloniality, social insects, haplodiploidy, reproductive division of labor, cooperation, chimaeras, germline, conflicts of interest, power imbalance
MeSH terms
Animals, Selection, Genetic, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review