The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Potential Reproductive Rates and the Operation of Sexual Selection
Abstract
In most animals, members of one sex compete more intensely for mates than members of the other sex, and show a greater development of secondary sexual traits. The relative intensity of mating competition in the two sexes depends on the operational sex ratio (OSR) (the ratio of males that are ready to mate to females that are ready to mate) at the site and times when mating occurs. The extent and direction of biases in the OSR is closely related to the potential rates of reproduction that individual males and females can achieve, although the distribution of the two sexes in space and time, sex differences in development time or life expectancy, and biases in the sex ratio at birth or hatching can also be important. The potential rates of reproduction in the two sexes are, in turn, affected by the proportion of time and energy expended by male and female parents on their progeny, though other factors may constrain reproductive rate in one or both sexes. We outline a simple model of the factors affecting the OSR, where relative parental expenditure by the two sexes and the adult sex ratio are fixed, and a more complex model where the adult sex ratio varies in relation to the reproductive activity of the two sexes. This framework for relating sex differences in mating competition to the OSR, potential reproductive rates, and parental expenditure differs from Triver's concept of the relation between parental investment and mating competition in three ways: first, it identifies the OSR as the immediate factor determining which sex completes most intensely for mates; second, it recognizes that factors other than the future fitness costs of rearing offspring can affect the potential reproductive rate of the two sexes; third, it suggests an empirical measure (potential reproductive rate) that can be estimated in natural populations and used to predict the distribution of mating competition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Schmitt, D. P. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x05000051 · Cited by 974
The function of nuptial feeding in insects: a review of empirical studies
VAHED, K. (1998) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1997.tb00025.x · Cited by 645
Neural circuit mechanisms of social behavior
Chen, P., & Hong, W. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.02.026 · Cited by 527
Sexual Hookup Culture: A Review
Garcia, J. R., Reiber, C., Massey, S. G., & Merriwether, A. M. (2012) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0027911 · Cited by 572
Bateman's principles and human sex roles
Brown, G. R., Laland, K. N., & Mulder, M. B. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.005 · Cited by 295
Evolution of sex differences in lifespan and aging: causes and constraints
Maklakov, A. A., & Lummaa, V. (2013) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.201300021 · Cited by 227
Hooking up: Gender Differences, Evolution, and Pluralistic Ignorance
Reiber, C., & Garcia, J. R. (2010) · Evolutionary Psychology · doi:10.1177/147470491000800307 · Cited by 110
Sexual Regret: Evidence for Evolved Sex Differences
Galperin, A., Haselton, M. G., Frederick, D. A., Poore, J., von Hippel, W., Buss, D. M., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2013) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-012-0019-3 · Cited by 101
Marriage Markets and Male Mating Effort: Violence and Crime Are Elevated Where Men Are Rare
Schacht, R., Tharp, D., & Smith, K. R. (2016) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-016-9271-x · Cited by 77
Sexual Conflict: The Battle of the Sexes Reversed
Kokko, H., & Jennions, M. D. (2008) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.063 · Cited by 50
Moreau, J., & Rigaud, T. (2000) · Oikos · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910308.x · Cited by 28
The context of sexual coercion in orang-utans: When do male and female mating interests collide?
Kunz, J. A., Duvot, G. J., Willems, E. P., Stickelberger, J., Spillmann, B., Utami Atmoko, S. S., van Noordwijk, M. A., & van Schaik, C. P. (2021) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.09.012 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Parker, G. A.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Review of Biology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1992-12
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 437-456
- ISSN
- 0033-5770 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-7718
- OpenAlex
- W2092707102
- Cited by
- 833
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.