Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 178

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: Clustering of Galaxies in Early Data

Open access
Coil, Alison L., Davis, Marc, Madgwick, Darren S., Newman, Jeffrey A., Conselice, Christopher J., Cooper, Michael, Ellis, Richard S., Faber, S. M., Finkbeiner, Douglas P., Guhathakurta, Puragra, Kaiser, Nick, Koo, David C., Phillips, Andrew C., Steidel, Charles C., Weiner, Benjamin J., Willmer, Christopher N. A., Yan, Renbin·2004·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We measure the two-point correlation function ξ( r p , π) in a sample of 2219 galaxies between z = 0.7 and 1.35 to a magnitude limit of R AB = 24.1 from the first season of the DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey. From ξ( r p , π) we recover the real-space correlation function, ξ( r ), which we find can be approximated within the errors by a power law, ξ( r ) = ( r / r 0 ) -γ , on scales ~0.1-10 h -1 Mpc. In a sample with an effective redshift of z eff = 0.82, for a ΛCDM cosmology we find r 0 = 3.53 ± 0.81 h -1 Mpc (comoving) and γ = 1.66 ± 0.12, while in a higher redshift sample with z eff = 1.14 we find r 0 = 3.12 ± 0.72 h -1 Mpc and γ = 1.66 ± 0.12. These errors are estimated from mock galaxy catalogs and are dominated by the cosmic variance present in the current data sample. We find that red, absorption-dominated, passively evolving galaxies have a larger clustering scale length, r 0 , than blue, emission-line, actively star-forming galaxies. Intrinsically brighter galaxies also cluster more strongly than fainter galaxies at z ≃ 1. Our results imply that the DEEP2 galaxies have an effective bias b = 0.96 ± 0.13 if σ 8DM = 1 today or b = 1.19 ± 0.16 if σ 8DM = 0.8 today. This bias is lower than that predicted by semianalytic simulations at z ≃ 1, which may be the result of our R -band target selection. We discuss possible evolutionary effects within our survey volume, and we compare our results with galaxy-clustering studies at other redshifts, noting that our star-forming sample at z ≃ 1 has selection criteria very similar to the Lyman break galaxies at z ≃ 3 and that our red, absorption-line sample displays a clustering strength comparable to the expected clustering of the Lyman break galaxy descendants at z ≃ 1. Our results demonstrate that galaxy-clustering properties as a function of color, spectral type, and luminosity seen in the local universe were largely in place by z ≃ 1.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/421337

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 178

Metadata

Authors
Coil, A. L., Davis, M., Madgwick, D. S., Newman, J. A., Conselice, C. J., Cooper, M., Ellis, R. S., Faber, S. M., Finkbeiner, D. P., Guhathakurta, P., Kaiser, N., Koo, D. C., Phillips, A. C., Steidel, C. C., Weiner, B. J., Willmer, C. N. A., & Yan, R.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2004-07-10
Volume
609
Issue
2
Pages
525-538
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1998731207
Cited by
178
References
1
FWCI
15.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: Clustering of Galaxies in Early Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/421337
The paper
Coil, A. L., Davis, M., Madgwick, D. S., Newman, J. A., Conselice, C. J., Cooper, M., Ellis, R. S., Faber, S. M., Finkbeiner, D. P., Guhathakurta, P., Kaiser, N., Koo, D. C., Phillips, A. C., Steidel, C. C., Weiner, B. J., Willmer, C. N. A., & Yan, R. (2004). The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: Clustering of Galaxies in Early Data. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/421337

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.