Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 379

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Deep Evolutionary Exploratory Probe 2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: The Galaxy Luminosity Function to z ∼ 1

Open access
Willmer, C. N. A., Faber, S. M., Koo, D. C., Weiner, B. J., Newman, J. A., Coil, A. L., Connolly, A. J., Conroy, C., Cooper, M. C., Davis, M., Finkbeiner, D. P., Gerke, B. F., Guhathakurta, P., Harker, J., Kaiser, N., Kassin, S., Konidaris, N. P., Lin, L., Luppino, G., Madgwick, D. S., Noeske, K. G., Phillips, A. C., Yan, R.·2006·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

The evolution of the B -band galaxy luminosity function is measured using a sample of more than 11,000 galaxies with spectroscopic redshifts from the DEEP2 Redshift Survey. The rest-frame M B versus U - B color-magnitude diagram of DEEP2 galaxies shows that the color-magnitude bimodality seen in galaxies locally is still present at redshifts z > 1. Dividing the sample at the trough of this color bimodality into predominantly red and blue galaxies, we find that the luminosity function of each galaxy color type evolves differently. Blue counts tend to shift to brighter magnitudes at constant number density, while the red counts remain largely constant at a fixed absolute magnitude. Using Schechter functions with fixed faint-end slopes we find that M for blue galaxies brightens by ~1.3 ± 0.14 mag per unit redshift, with no significant evolution in number density. For red galaxies M brightens somewhat less with redshift, while the formal value of ϕ* declines. When the population of blue galaxies is subdivided into two halves using the rest-frame color as the criterion, the measured evolution of both blue subpopulations is very similar.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/505455

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

See all 379

Metadata

Authors
Willmer, C. N. A., Faber, S. M., Koo, D. C., Weiner, B. J., Newman, J. A., Coil, A. L., Connolly, A. J., Conroy, C., Cooper, M. C., Davis, M., Finkbeiner, D. P., Gerke, B. F., Guhathakurta, P., Harker, J., Kaiser, N., Kassin, S., Konidaris, N. P., Lin, L., Luppino, G., Madgwick, D. S., Noeske, K. G., Phillips, A. C., & Yan, R.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2006-08-20
Volume
647
Issue
2
Pages
853-873
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1959064610
Cited by
379
References
43
FWCI
22.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Deep Evolutionary Exploratory Probe 2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: The Galaxy Luminosity Function to z ∼ 1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/505455
The paper
Willmer, C. N. A., Faber, S. M., Koo, D. C., Weiner, B. J., Newman, J. A., Coil, A. L., Connolly, A. J., Conroy, C., Cooper, M. C., Davis, M., Finkbeiner, D. P., Gerke, B. F., Guhathakurta, P., Harker, J., Kaiser, N., Kassin, S., Konidaris, N. P., Lin, L., Luppino, G., . . . Yan, R. (2006). The Deep Evolutionary Exploratory Probe 2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: The Galaxy Luminosity Function to z ∼ 1. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/505455

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.