Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On Foreground Removal from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe Data by an Internal Linear Combination Method: Limitations and Implications

Open access
Eriksen, H. K., Banday, A. J., Gorski, K. M., Lilje, P. B.·2004·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We study the Internal Linear Combination (ILC) method presented by the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) science team, with the goal of determining whether it may be used for cosmological purposes, as a template-free alternative to existing foreground-correction methods. We conclude that the method does have the potential to do just that, but great care must be taken both in implementation and in a detailed understanding of limitations caused by residual foregrounds, which can still affect cosmological results. As a first step we demonstrate how to compute the ILC weights both accurately and efficiently by means of Lagrange multipliers, and we apply this method to the observed data to produce a new version of the ILC map. This map has 12% lower variance than the ILC map of the WMAP team, primarily because of less noise. Next we describe how to generate Monte Carlo simulations of the ILC map and find that these agree well with the observed map on angular scales up to l ≈ 200, using a conservative sky cut. Finally we make two comments to the ongoing debates concerning the large-scale properties of the WMAP data. First, we note that the Galactic southeastern quadrant is associated with notably different ILC weights than the other three quadrants, possibly indicating a foreground-related anisotropy. Second, we study the properties of the quadrupole and octopole (amplitude, alignment, and planarity) and reproduce the previously reported results that the quadrupole and octopole are strongly aligned and that the octopole is moderately planar. Even more interestingly, we find that the l = 5 mode is spherically symmetric at about 3 σ, and that the l = 6 mode is planar at the 2 σ level. However, we also assess the impact of residual foregrounds on these statistics, and find that the ILC map is not clean enough to allow for cosmological conclusions. Alternative methods must be developed to study these issues further.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/422807

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 274

Metadata

Authors
Eriksen, H. K., Banday, A. J., Gorski, K. M., & Lilje, P. B.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2004-09-10
Volume
612
Issue
2
Pages
633-646
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W1989963731
Cited by
274
References
2
FWCI
16.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On Foreground Removal from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe Data by an Internal Linear Combination Method: Limitations and Implications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/422807
The paper
Eriksen, H. K., Banday, A. J., Gorski, K. M., & Lilje, P. B. (2004). On Foreground Removal from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe Data by an Internal Linear Combination Method: Limitations and Implications. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/422807

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.