The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Asymmetries in the Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy Field
Open accessAbstract
We report on the results from two independent but complementary statistical analyses of the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe ( WMAP ) first-year data, based on the power spectrum and N -point correlation functions. We focus on large and intermediate scales (larger than about 3°) and compare the observed data against Monte Carlo ensembles with WMAP -like properties. In both analyses, we measure the amplitudes of the large-scale fluctuations on opposing hemispheres and study the ratio of the two amplitudes. The power-spectrum analysis shows that this ratio for WMAP , as measured along the axis of maximum asymmetry, is high at the 95%-99% level (depending on the particular multipole range included). The axis of maximum asymmetry of the WMAP data is weakly dependent on the multipole range under consideration but tends to lie close to the ecliptic axis. In the N -point correlation-function analysis, we focus on the northern and southern hemispheres defined in ecliptic coordinates, and we find that the ratio of the large-scale fluctuation amplitudes is high at the 98%-99% level. Furthermore, the results are stable with respect to choice of Galactic cut and also with respect to frequency band. A similar asymmetry is found in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer (DMR) map, and the axis of maximum asymmetry is close to the one found in the WMAP data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Seemingly anomalous correlations have already been detected among the low-multipole CMB anisotropies, which might indicate deviations from statistical isotropy in the inflationary spectrum.
“Indeed, seemingly anomalous correlations have already been detected among the low-multipole CMB anisotropies [20,21,22,23,24], which might indicate deviations from statistical isotropy in the inflationary spectrum.”
From Observable effects of anisotropic bubble nucleation (2010) · cites this paper as [24]
The Conclusions report an anisotropic distribution of large-scale CMB power at multipoles ℓ = 2–40, corroborated by an N-point correlation-function analysis. They allow that unusual large-scale features might require new physics, but do not specifically link the asymmetry to statistical isotropy in the inflationary spectrum. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., Limon, M., Meyer, S. S., Page, L., Spergel, D. N., Tucker, G. S., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377253 · Cited by 4,860
Is the low cosmic microwave background quadrupole a signature of spatial curvature?
Efstathiou, G. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06940.x · Cited by 210
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 10.1086/308698 · DOI
- 10.1086/377252 · DOI · Paper page
- Coles, P., Dineen, P., Earl, J. & Wright, D. 2004, MNRAS, in press (astro-ph/0310252) · arXiv
- Copi, C. J., Huterer, D. & Starkman, G. D. 2004, Phys. Rev. D, submitted (astro-ph/0310511) · arXiv
- de Oliveira-Costa, A., Tegmark, M., Zaldarriaga, M. & Hamilton, A. 2004, preprint (astro-ph/0307282) · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1365-2966.2003.07304.x · DOI
- Efstathiou, G. 2004, MNRAS, submitted (astro-ph/0310207) · arXiv
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20021264 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.021302 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05878.x · DOI
- 10.1086/377222 · DOI
- 10.1086/377225 · DOI
- 10.1086/312431 · DOI
- Naselsky, P. D., Verkhodanov, O. V., Chiang, L.Y. & Novikov, I. D. 2004, ApJ, submitted (astro-ph/0310235) · arXiv
- 10.1086/377223 · DOI
- Park, C.G. 2004, MNRAS, submitted (astro-ph/0307469) · arXiv
- 10.1086/377226 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.123523 · DOI
- Vielva, P., Martinez-Gonzalez E., Barreiro, R. B., Sanz, J. L. & Cayon, L. 2003, preprint (astro-ph/0310273) · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
FIVE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Komatsu, E., Dunkley, J., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D., Limon, M., Page, L., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/330 · Cited by 5,786
Dunkley, J., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Spergel, D. N., Larson, D., Hinshaw, G., Page, L., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Jarosik, N., et al. (2009) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/180/2/306 · Cited by 1,787
The large-scale structure of the Universe
Springel, V., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04805 · Cited by 780
Observable effects of anisotropic bubble nucleation
Blanco-Pillado, J. J., & Salem, M. P. (2010) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2010/07/007 · Cited by 44
Abdalla, E., Abellán, G. F., Aboubrahim, A., Agnello, A., Akarsu, Ö., Akrami, Y., Alestas, G., Aloni, D., Amendola, L., Anchordoqui, L. A., et al. (2022) · Journal of High Energy Astrophysics · doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2022.04.002 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Eriksen, H. K., Hansen, F. K., Banday, A. J., Gorski, K. M., & Lilje, P. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Oslo (NO)
- University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT)
- Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics (DE)
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2004-04-10
- Volume
- 605
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-20
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2170603249
- Cited by
- 767
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 32
- FWCI
- 23.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Keywords
- cosmic microwave background anisotropies, hemispheric lateralization, large-scale fluctuations, n-point functions, power spectrum, COBE DMR, ecliptic coordinates, Monte Carlo simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review