Cited by 488Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is the Low-ℓMicrowave Background Cosmic?

Open access
Schwarz, Dominik J., Starkman, Glenn D., Huterer, Dragan, Copi, Craig J.·2004·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

The large-angle (low-l) correlations of the cosmic microwave background exhibit several statistically significant anomalies compared to the standard inflationary cosmology. We show that the quadrupole plane and the three octopole planes are far more aligned than previously thought (99.9% C.L.). Three of these planes are orthogonal to the ecliptic at 99.1% C.L., and the normals to these planes are aligned at 99.6% C.L. with the direction of the cosmological dipole and with the equinoxes. The remaining octopole plane is orthogonal to the supergalactic plane at 99.6% C.L.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.93.221301

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Seemingly anomalous correlations have already been detected among the low-multipole CMB anisotropies, which might indicate deviations from statistical isotropy in the inflationary spectrum.

    “Indeed, seemingly anomalous correlations have already been detected among the low-multipole CMB anisotropies [20,21,22,23,24], which might indicate deviations from statistical isotropy in the inflationary spectrum.”

    From Observable effects of anisotropic bubble nucleation (2010) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Abstract reports statistically significant low-multipole correlations and says they are difficult to reconcile with standard inflationary cosmology’s prediction of statistical isotropy. It does not establish that the inflationary spectrum itself is anisotropic; the authors also suggest a local source or an unrecognized systematic as possible explanations. The indexed copy supplies no page number for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. 10.1086/180024 · DOI
  2. G. Hinshaw, 2003, Astrophys. J., 148, S135, 10.1086/377225 · DOI
  3. 10.1086/149134 · DOI
  4. 10.1086/186504 · DOI
  5. 10.1086/312293 · DOI
  6. 10.1086/317322 · DOI
  7. 10.1086/338879 · DOI
  8. 10.1086/375508 · DOI
  9. A. C. Taylor, 2003, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 341, 1066, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06493.x · DOI
  10. 10.1086/379345 · DOI
  11. 10.1051/0004-6361:20021850 · DOI
  12. 10.1086/379783 · DOI
  13. 10.1086/310076 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07409.x · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.083511 · DOI
  16. 10.1086/422807 · DOI
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.123003 · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.063516 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1086/382267 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.043515 · DOI
  21. 10.1086/376822 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07500.x · DOI
  23. 10.1086/424659 · DOI
  24. 10.1086/421007 · DOI
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.053008 · DOI
  26. 10.1086/421904 · DOI
  27. 10.1103/PhysRev.174.2168 · DOI
  28. 10.1086/306805 · DOI
  29. 10.1086/168600 · DOI
  30. 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.063001 · DOI
  31. 10.1103/PhysRevD.68.123523 · DOI
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.063527 · DOI
  33. K. Gorski, 1998, Proceedings of the MPA/ESO Cosmology Conference “Evolution of Large-Scale Structure”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schwarz, D. J., Starkman, G. D., Huterer, D., & Copi, C. J.
Affiliations
  • European Organization for Nuclear Research (CH)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
2004-11-23
Volume
93
Issue
22
Pages
221301-221301
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W2013101909
Cited by
488
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 26
FWCI
20.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
  • Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
cosmic microwave background, quadrupole, cosmological dipole, supergalactic plane, cosmic inflation, large-angle correlations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review