The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling the Pan–Spectral Energy Distribution of Starburst Galaxies. I. The Role of ISM Pressure and the Molecular Cloud Dissipation Timescale
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, we combine the stellar spectral synthesis code STARBURST99, the nebular modeling code MAPPINGS IIIq, a one-dimensional dynamical evolution model of H II regions around massive clusters of young stars, and a simplified model of synchrotron emissivity to produce purely theoretical self-consistent synthetic spectral energy distributions (SEDs) for (solar metallicity) starbursts lasting ~10 8 yr. These SEDs extend from the Lyman limit to beyond 21 cm. We find that two ISM parameters control the form of the SED: the pressure in the diffuse phase of the ISM (or, equivalently, its density), and the molecular cloud dissipation timescale. In particular, the shape of the far-infrared (dust re-emission) bump is strongly dependent on the mean pressure in the star-forming or starburst galaxy. This can explain the range of far-infrared (FIR) colors seen in starburst galaxies. In the case of objects of composite excitation, such diagrams potentially provide a means of estimating the fraction of the FIR emission that is contributed by an active nucleus. We present detailed SED fits to Arp 220 and NGC 6240, and we give the predicted colors for starburst galaxies derived from our models for the IRAS and the Spitzer Space Telescope MIPS and IRAC instruments. Our models reproduce the spread in observed colors of starburst galaxies. From both the SED fits and the color : color diagrams, we infer the presence of a population of compact and ultracompact H II regions around single OB stars or small OB clusters. Finally, we present absolute calibrations to convert observed fluxes into star formation rates in the UV ( GALEX ), at optical wavelengths (Hα), and in the IR ( IRAS or Spitzer ). We show that 25 μm fluxes are particularly valuable as star formation indicators, since they largely eliminate one of the parameters controlling the IR SED.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Starburst99: Synthesis Models for Galaxies with Active Star Formation
Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., Delgado, R. M. G., Robert, C., Kune, D. F., de Mello, D. F., Devost, D., & Heckman, T. M. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/313233 · Cited by 4,126
Self-citationInterstellar bubbles. II - Structure and evolution
Weaver, R., McCray, R., Castor, J., Shapiro, P., & Moore, R. (1977) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/155692 · Cited by 1,736
Cited by
A simple model to interpret the ultraviolet, optical and infrared emission from galaxies
da Cunha, E., Charlot, S., & Elbaz, D. (2008) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13535.x · Cited by 1,234
Dusty star-forming galaxies at high redshift
Casey, C. M., Narayanan, D., & Cooray, A. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.02.009 · Cited by 800
Fitting the integrated spectral energy distributions of galaxies
Walcher, J., Groves, B., Budavári, T., & Dale, D. (2011) · Astrophysics and Space Science · doi:10.1007/s10509-010-0458-z · Cited by 344
Self-citationDopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., Nicholls, D. C., Kewley, L. J., & Vogt, F. P. A. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/10 · Cited by 296
Self-citationEffects of Preionization in Radiative Shocks. I. Self-consistent Models
Sutherland, R. S., & Dopita, M. A. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa6541 · Cited by 170
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dopita, M. A., Groves, B. A., Fischera, J., Sutherland, R. S., Tuffs, R. J., Popescu, C. C., Kewley, L. J., Reuland, M., & Leitherer, C.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 619
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 755-778
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2131303567
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.